<div>The G6 Alliance today announced it is moving into the trans-Pacific with the launch of joint services on the Asia-North America East Coast trades in May, a little over a year after its member carriers teamed up on the Far East-Europe route.The alliance will deploy more than 50 container ships on six joint services through the Panama and Suez canals calling at almost 30 ports in Asia, North America East Coast, Canada, Central America, the Caribbean, the Indian subcontinent, the Mediterranean and the Middle East.“Our cooperation in the Asia-to-Europe market has successfully provided customers with comprehensive service coverage as well...

The G6 Alliance today announced it is moving into the trans-Pacific with the launch of joint services on the Asia-North America East Coast trades in May, a little over a year after its member carriers teamed up on the Far East-Europe route. The alliance will deploy more than 50 container ships on six joint services through the Panama and Suez canals calling at almost 30 ports in Asia, North America East Coast, Canada, Central America, the Caribbean, the Indian subcontinent, the Mediterranean and the Middle East. “Our cooperation in the Asia-to-Europe market has successfully provided customers with comprehensive service coverage as well as operating efficiencies,” the member carriers said in a joint statement. “This new agreement will bring the same winning formula to the Asia-to-North America East Coast trade and benefit shippers trading in this key trade lane.” The G6 Alliance, which was established in December 2011 and began operations in March 2012, merged the Grand Alliance of Hapag-Lloyd, NYK Line and Orient Overseas Container Line and the New World Alliance of APL, Hyundai Merchant Marine and MOL. The new services, three of which will transit the Panama Canal and three the Suez Canal, will offer and increased sailing frequency than currently provided by the New World Alliance and the Grand Alliance combined. “The six loops are the result of the merger and revision of several existing services separately offered by the two alliances. It also includes an entirely new service to form a comprehensive and competitive trans-Pacific network,” the carriers said.

Container lines

G6 Alliance Expands Into Trans-Pacific Trade

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The ocean carrier looks to secure berth slots and yard space ahead of 2025 as container lines and new alliances plan to leverage terminal ownership stakes. </div>

The ocean carrier looks to secure berth slots and yard space ahead of 2025 as container lines and new alliances plan to leverage terminal ownership stakes.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">Ocean Network Express (ONE) has taken a minority stake in an Indonesian container terminal, adding to the carrier’s global terminal portfolio. The acquisition comes as carriers tout their control of terminals as a service differentiator ahead of new alliances coming in 2025. ONE said in a statement that it completed the acquisition of a minority stake in the New Priok Container Terminal One in Jakarta. The terminal, which has nominal capacity of 1.5 million TEUs per year, has two berths capable of handling post-Panamax ships. The terminal is a joint venture of Indonesian state-owned port operator Pelindo II, Singapore’s PSA International and Japanese conglomerate Mitsui &amp; Co. ONE said that Jakarta is its third-busiest port in Southeast Asia, while the acquisition “helps safeguard the company’s access to terminal capacity in an important region.” Terms of the deal were not disclosed. New Priok was built due to the capacity constraints at the Jakarta International Container Terminal, which can berth up to eight post-Panamax vessels. ONE’s intra-Asia services primarily call the Jakarta terminal, with only two of its vessels having called on the New Priok terminal in the last six months according to Sea-web, a sister product of the Journal of Commerce within S&amp;P Global. The acquisition of the New Priok stake comes almost a year after ONE completed acquisitions of controlling and minority stakes in terminal assets across the globe, including Yusen Terminals and Trapac on the US West Coast, Rotterdam’s World Gateway terminal and the Magenta Singapore terminal. Control of terminal assets has been a critical issue for ocean carriers going into 2025, especially with the debut of new container alliance and service networks. The Gemini Cooperation of Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd have pointed to ownership of container terminals as underpinning their goal of 90% schedule reliability for the new alliance’s transshipment model. In southeast Asia, Gemini will be relying on the performance of Malaysia’s Port Tanjung Pelepas terminal, which is 30% owned by Maersk’s APM Terminals subsidiary. Hapag-Lloyd, too, has been rounding out its terminal network with deals for port operators in South America, India and Italy. CMA CGM has boosted its North American terminal presence with deals on both the US West and East coasts. Its Ocean Alliance partner, Evergreen Marine, also entered a joint venture with PSA for building a new transshipment hub in Singapore. Meanwhile, Mediterranean Shipping Co. is building out the capacity of its Terminal International Limited subsidiary with expansion projects for its existing terminal assets and the development of new terminals along the US East and Gulf coasts. Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a></div>

Ocean Network Express (ONE) has taken a minority stake in an Indonesian container terminal, adding to the carrier’s global terminal portfolio. The acquisition comes as carriers tout their control of terminals as a service differentiator ahead of new alliances coming in 2025. ONE said in a statement that it completed the acquisition of a minority stake in the New Priok Container Terminal One in Jakarta. The terminal, which has nominal capacity of 1.5 million TEUs per year, has two berths capable of handling post-Panamax ships. The terminal is a joint venture of Indonesian state-owned port operator Pelindo II, Singapore’s PSA International and Japanese conglomerate Mitsui & Co. ONE said that Jakarta is its third-busiest port in Southeast Asia, while the acquisition “helps safeguard the company’s access to terminal capacity in an important region.” Terms of the deal were not disclosed. New Priok was built due to the capacity constraints at the Jakarta International Container Terminal, which can berth up to eight post-Panamax vessels. ONE’s intra-Asia services primarily call the Jakarta terminal, with only two of its vessels having called on the New Priok terminal in the last six months according to Sea-web, a sister product of the Journal of Commerce within S&P Global. The acquisition of the New Priok stake comes almost a year after ONE completed acquisitions of controlling and minority stakes in terminal assets across the globe, including Yusen Terminals and Trapac on the US West Coast, Rotterdam’s World Gateway terminal and the Magenta Singapore terminal. Control of terminal assets has been a critical issue for ocean carriers going into 2025, especially with the debut of new container alliance and service networks. The Gemini Cooperation of Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd have pointed to ownership of container terminals as underpinning their goal of 90% schedule reliability for the new alliance’s transshipment model. In southeast Asia, Gemini will be relying on the performance of Malaysia’s Port Tanjung Pelepas terminal, which is 30% owned by Maersk’s APM Terminals subsidiary. Hapag-Lloyd, too, has been rounding out its terminal network with deals for port operators in South America, India and Italy. CMA CGM has boosted its North American terminal presence with deals on both the US West and East coasts. Its Ocean Alliance partner, Evergreen Marine, also entered a joint venture with PSA for building a new transshipment hub in Singapore. Meanwhile, Mediterranean Shipping Co. is building out the capacity of its Terminal International Limited subsidiary with expansion projects for its existing terminal assets and the development of new terminals along the US East and Gulf coasts. Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com

Container Shipping News

Port News

Marine terminals

International ports

Maritime

ONE adds to terminal holdings with stake in Indonesian operator

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The two biggest transportation visibility vendors in the market have been battling each other in court since 2019 but can now refocus on winning market share.</div>

The two biggest transportation visibility vendors in the market have been battling each other in court since 2019 but can now refocus on winning market share.

<div class="phx-topic">A long-simmering legal saga between project44 and FourKites — the two biggest names in the real-time transportation visibility space — has been resolved, the companies said Monday. The dispute involved two separate legal complaints that were part of a years-long battle between the companies. Details of the resolutions to both complaints were not disclosed. That legal battle began in 2019 when Project44 filed a defamation lawsuit in Illinois over two emails sent by FourKites founder and CEO Mathew Elenjickal to three individuals associated with project44. Separately, FourKites in 2022 filed a lawsuit against project44 and two former employees who moved to project44, contending the parties violated contractual non-compete clauses. “We are glad to put these disputes behind us,” Elenjickal said in a statement. “Our focus has always been on bringing innovation to market, transforming supply chains and driving unmatched value to our customers. That will continue to be our mission.” Project44 seemed to have won a key battle in March in its defamation case, with the Illinois Supreme Court ruling that the emails sent in 2019 to its board members were “published” and thus constituted defamation, allowing its case to proceed. “Today project44 is pleased to announce a very favorable resolution of our defamation lawsuit against Four Kites...,” project44 General Counsel Jennifer Coyne said in a statement to the Journal of Commerce. “As the Illinois Supreme Court found, Mr. Elenjickal’s emails containing ‘defamatory statements made to corporate [e]mployees … can harm the corporation’s business reputation among those employees.’ We are confident this Supreme Court decision will deter future unprofessional and destructive communications that have no purpose other than to unfairly harass and mislead competitors.” The two rival vendors have had an acrimonious relationship as they individually helped build the multimodal visibility market through the raising of hundreds of millions of dollars of venture capital, acquisitions of niche vendors and attracting shippers and logistics providers as customers. Contact Eric Johnson at <a href="mailto:eric.johnson@spglobal.com">eric.johnson@spglobal.com.</a></div>

A long-simmering legal saga between project44 and FourKites — the two biggest names in the real-time transportation visibility space — has been resolved, the companies said Monday. The dispute involved two separate legal complaints that were part of a years-long battle between the companies. Details of the resolutions to both complaints were not disclosed. That legal battle began in 2019 when Project44 filed a defamation lawsuit in Illinois over two emails sent by FourKites founder and CEO Mathew Elenjickal to three individuals associated with project44. Separately, FourKites in 2022 filed a lawsuit against project44 and two former employees who moved to project44, contending the parties violated contractual non-compete clauses. “We are glad to put these disputes behind us,” Elenjickal said in a statement. “Our focus has always been on bringing innovation to market, transforming supply chains and driving unmatched value to our customers. That will continue to be our mission.” Project44 seemed to have won a key battle in March in its defamation case, with the Illinois Supreme Court ruling that the emails sent in 2019 to its board members were “published” and thus constituted defamation, allowing its case to proceed. “Today project44 is pleased to announce a very favorable resolution of our defamation lawsuit against Four Kites...,” project44 General Counsel Jennifer Coyne said in a statement to the Journal of Commerce. “As the Illinois Supreme Court found, Mr. Elenjickal’s emails containing ‘defamatory statements made to corporate [e]mployees … can harm the corporation’s business reputation among those employees.’ We are confident this Supreme Court decision will deter future unprofessional and destructive communications that have no purpose other than to unfairly harass and mislead competitors.” The two rival vendors have had an acrimonious relationship as they individually helped build the multimodal visibility market through the raising of hundreds of millions of dollars of venture capital, acquisitions of niche vendors and attracting shippers and logistics providers as customers. Contact Eric Johnson at eric.johnson@spglobal.com.

Logistics Technology News

FourKites, project44 resolve legal disputes over defamation, poaching

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">While India-USEC spot rates have steadily dropped from a late-July peak because of the demand downturn and increased capacity, co-loaders have been even more aggressive in adjusting rates downward to reach their slot targets.</div>

While India-USEC spot rates have steadily dropped from a late-July peak because of the demand downturn and increased capacity, co-loaders have been even more aggressive in adjusting rates downward to reach their slot targets.

<div class="phx-topic">Desperate market share efforts by smaller carriers working on slot rights are seriously hurting rate dynamics on the India-US East Coast trade lane, according to local market sources in India. Freight forwarders who spoke with the Journal of Commerce noted that the lead carriers, who now operate standalone services on the route due to recent network changes linked to the Gemini alliance formation, have had to strike slot deals to fill expanded loading capacity out of India. To illustrate, Cosco Shipping and its subsidiary OOCL together hold about 1,500 TEUs of slot space per week on vessels operated by CMA CGM’s Indamex service and Ocean Network Express’ West India-North America (WIN) service. Additionally, HMM has an ongoing slot deal with ONE on the WIN. While India-USEC spot rates have steadily dropped from a late-July peak because of the demand downturn and increased capacity, co-loaders have been even more aggressive in adjusting rates downward, often on a vessel-to-vessel basis, to reach their slot targets. Forwarders are reporting a variance of up to $500 per FEU between rates quoted by consortium-leading carriers and their slot partners, leaving little room for pricing discipline in the market. “Cosco is usually the first to drop rates, forcing the mainline operators to proactively adjust their pricing accordingly,” a sales executive at a Mumbai-based forwarding house who didn’t want to be identified told the Journal of Commerce. “It’s the secondary carriers who are now setting market behavior.” “All carriers are chasing customers with volume-based special rates,” a second forwarder executive noted. “For customers committing double-digit bookings, rates are lower by no less than $200 per box than the general trendline.” <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="893ffa5c-0a69-45c7-a555-425e44318711"></dynamic-object></div>Forwarders put spot rates from Cosco as of late last week for loads from Nhava Sheva to New York at $1,800 per FEU, compared with the $2,100 to $2,200 per FEU CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd were offering. Platts, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&amp;P Global, pegged India-USEC rates at $2,140 per FEU as of Nov. 29, down 2% on the week. Contact Bency Mathew at <a href="mailto:bencymathew@gmail.com">bencymathew@gmail.com</a>. </div>

Desperate market share efforts by smaller carriers working on slot rights are seriously hurting rate dynamics on the India-US East Coast trade lane, according to local market sources in India. Freight forwarders who spoke with the Journal of Commerce noted that the lead carriers, who now operate standalone services on the route due to recent network changes linked to the Gemini alliance formation, have had to strike slot deals to fill expanded loading capacity out of India. To illustrate, Cosco Shipping and its subsidiary OOCL together hold about 1,500 TEUs of slot space per week on vessels operated by CMA CGM’s Indamex service and Ocean Network Express’ West India-North America (WIN) service. Additionally, HMM has an ongoing slot deal with ONE on the WIN. While India-USEC spot rates have steadily dropped from a late-July peak because of the demand downturn and increased capacity, co-loaders have been even more aggressive in adjusting rates downward, often on a vessel-to-vessel basis, to reach their slot targets. Forwarders are reporting a variance of up to $500 per FEU between rates quoted by consortium-leading carriers and their slot partners, leaving little room for pricing discipline in the market. “Cosco is usually the first to drop rates, forcing the mainline operators to proactively adjust their pricing accordingly,” a sales executive at a Mumbai-based forwarding house who didn’t want to be identified told the Journal of Commerce. “It’s the secondary carriers who are now setting market behavior.” “All carriers are chasing customers with volume-based special rates,” a second forwarder executive noted. “For customers committing double-digit bookings, rates are lower by no less than $200 per box than the general trendline.” Forwarders put spot rates from Cosco as of late last week for loads from Nhava Sheva to New York at $1,800 per FEU, compared with the $2,100 to $2,200 per FEU CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd were offering. Platts, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&P Global, pegged India-USEC rates at $2,140 per FEU as of Nov. 29, down 2% on the week. Contact Bency Mathew at bencymathew@gmail.com .

Forwarding

Co-loader slot deals squeezing pricing power for India-US carriers: forwarders

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">A host of factors can raise transit times on the 11,000-plus-kilometer rail network, undermining the trust of cargo owners that is a crucial selling point of the Asia-Europe connection.</div>

A host of factors can raise transit times on the 11,000-plus-kilometer rail network, undermining the trust of cargo owners that is a crucial selling point of the Asia-Europe connection.

<div class="phx-topic">VIENNA — The ability to deliver on promised schedules remains one of the main challenges facing rail transport providers on the so-called middle corridor connecting China and Europe, according to executives at an intercontinental rail conference here last week. But on-time performance was the point of an iceberg of underlying reliability challenges, attendees at the European Silk Road Summit in Vienna were told. ”As long as everything goes well, the customer is happy, but if something goes wrong, the customer will start to doubt rail more than they would do for sea freight,” said Alona Toprak, managing director at DB Cargo Eurasia. Containerized freight on the middle corridor uses multiple cargo handovers — from rail to ferry to road and back to rail — with delays at key modal change points. Cross-border customs issues can add to delays, with volatile rates and equipment imbalances all placing service level promises under pressure. Still, meeting those promises is a selling point for the intercontinental rail network that cannot be compromised, logistics executives warned delegates. Thomas Kargl, director of Eurasian logistics provider Smartlog, told the summit that rail services from China to Europe had always suffered from a lack of reliability and it took much consulting time with shippers to change that impression. “If I say we are running between 12 and 15 days, we must hold that time,” Kargl said. “To attract customers, they must recognize that rail is available and is reliable. We are talking about containers valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars, so an increase of the transit time by a few days will tie up a lot of capital.” Toprak agreed and said customers of high-value products moving by rail had high expectations and were “very demanding.” DB Cargo Eurasia introduced an express rail service from China to Europe at the end of 2023 and expanded the offering this year. Toprak said it was now possible to offer shippers a nine-day transit time from China to the Malaszewicze rail hub in Poland via the northern corridor that was attractive to e-commerce, but it also raised the reliability bar even higher. ”The lead time of nine days is a real option for e-commerce, but if we promise nine days, we must stick to it because if not the customer will be penalized, lose money and then the service will not be trusted,” she said. <h3>Peak time delays </h3>There are several hurdles that must be overcome by service providers offering fast rail transit times, especially on the middle corridor with the intermodal requirements and the repeated border crossings, Kargl noted. China’s railways have a different gauge to those used in Europe that requires cargo to be transhipped at the China-Kazakhstan border and again at European entry points. At peak times, that can lead to delays. The service providers must also manage other factors, including the documentation for shipments and ensuring it is communicated electronically to all customs authorities along the route. In addition, sufficient equipment and access to rolling stock need to be guaranteed, while the provision of advance bookings and cargo closing times need to be ensured. “If you manage this all in a smooth way, the nine days transit will be reachable 80% of the time,” Kargl said. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, containerized trade on the northern route from China to North Europe largely dried up. Most of the cargo was moved to ocean, but forwarders and rail freight operators began testing the middle corridor that runs from China through Central Asia, across the Caspian and Black seas, and on into Turkey or Eastern Europe. While some cargo has returned to the northern route through Russia, concerns over sanctions breaches and moral opposition to contributing revenue to Russian Railways is limiting volume. However, Kelvin Tang, the head of global cross-border business and multimodal leader at CEVA Logistics, said shipping containerized cargo on the middle corridor was not just a political solution, it was a product offering. “If customers can accept 60 days transit, they will choose ocean, but if they want 30 days or less, they need to choose rail,” Tang told the summit. “If rail service becomes more stable with reliable lead times and competitive prices, it will become more attractive.” Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

VIENNA — The ability to deliver on promised schedules remains one of the main challenges facing rail transport providers on the so-called middle corridor connecting China and Europe, according to executives at an intercontinental rail conference here last week. But on-time performance was the point of an iceberg of underlying reliability challenges, attendees at the European Silk Road Summit in Vienna were told. ”As long as everything goes well, the customer is happy, but if something goes wrong, the customer will start to doubt rail more than they would do for sea freight,” said Alona Toprak, managing director at DB Cargo Eurasia. Containerized freight on the middle corridor uses multiple cargo handovers — from rail to ferry to road and back to rail — with delays at key modal change points. Cross-border customs issues can add to delays, with volatile rates and equipment imbalances all placing service level promises under pressure. Still, meeting those promises is a selling point for the intercontinental rail network that cannot be compromised, logistics executives warned delegates. Thomas Kargl, director of Eurasian logistics provider Smartlog, told the summit that rail services from China to Europe had always suffered from a lack of reliability and it took much consulting time with shippers to change that impression. “If I say we are running between 12 and 15 days, we must hold that time,” Kargl said. “To attract customers, they must recognize that rail is available and is reliable. We are talking about containers valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars, so an increase of the transit time by a few days will tie up a lot of capital.” Toprak agreed and said customers of high-value products moving by rail had high expectations and were “very demanding.” DB Cargo Eurasia introduced an express rail service from China to Europe at the end of 2023 and expanded the offering this year. Toprak said it was now possible to offer shippers a nine-day transit time from China to the Malaszewicze rail hub in Poland via the northern corridor that was attractive to e-commerce, but it also raised the reliability bar even higher. ”The lead time of nine days is a real option for e-commerce, but if we promise nine days, we must stick to it because if not the customer will be penalized, lose money and then the service will not be trusted,” she said. Peak time delays There are several hurdles that must be overcome by service providers offering fast rail transit times, especially on the middle corridor with the intermodal requirements and the repeated border crossings, Kargl noted. China’s railways have a different gauge to those used in Europe that requires cargo to be transhipped at the China-Kazakhstan border and again at European entry points. At peak times, that can lead to delays. The service providers must also manage other factors, including the documentation for shipments and ensuring it is communicated electronically to all customs authorities along the route. In addition, sufficient equipment and access to rolling stock need to be guaranteed, while the provision of advance bookings and cargo closing times need to be ensured. “If you manage this all in a smooth way, the nine days transit will be reachable 80% of the time,” Kargl said. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, containerized trade on the northern route from China to North Europe largely dried up. Most of the cargo was moved to ocean, but forwarders and rail freight operators began testing the middle corridor that runs from China through Central Asia, across the Caspian and Black seas, and on into Turkey or Eastern Europe. While some cargo has returned to the northern route through Russia, concerns over sanctions breaches and moral opposition to contributing revenue to Russian Railways is limiting volume. However, Kelvin Tang, the head of global cross-border business and multimodal leader at CEVA Logistics, said shipping containerized cargo on the middle corridor was not just a political solution, it was a product offering. “If customers can accept 60 days transit, they will choose ocean, but if they want 30 days or less, they need to choose rail,” Tang told the summit. “If rail service becomes more stable with reliable lead times and competitive prices, it will become more attractive.” Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com .

Rail News

International rail

Surface

Schedule reliability remains key challenge for China-Europe rail

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Rising regional trade along the old Silk Road between China and Europe is driving up containerized rail volume on the middle corridor and the logistics infrastructure is struggling to keep up. </div>

Rising regional trade along the old Silk Road between China and Europe is driving up containerized rail volume on the middle corridor and the logistics infrastructure is struggling to keep up.

<div class="phx-topic">VIENNA — Geopolitics shaped the middle corridor rail network between China and Europe, but the route has evolved in the past two years from an alternative to the heavily sanctioned northern route through Russia into a critical lifeline for the booming economies of Central Asia. Huge investments are being made across the region as the logistics infrastructure struggles to catch up with demand, attendees at the European Silk Road Summit were told this week. “We see a future for the middle corridor, and we are putting our money where our mouths are and investing billions in projects in Central Asia,” said Luis Blancas, senior transport and logistics specialist at the World Bank. “The middle corridor is an entirely discretionary connection for China, but for Central Asia it is a lifeline connection to the world. It’s a lifeline for Turkey, Azerbaijan, Georgia. They want to trade more with Central Asia and the middle corridor is very important for that.” That the middle corridor was a viable trade route, as well as an improving option for China-Europe shippers, was a theme expressed time and again by speakers at the summit. Emil Mammadov, advisor to the chairman of Azerbaijan Railways, said the future of the middle corridor was “fully related” to the economies of Central Asia where demand was developing fast and rail capacity had to match that growth. “The middle corridor is not just an alternative, it is a working corridor,” he told the summit. “This year to date, we have had more than 260 block trains from China going through Azerbaijan and by the end of December that will have increased to 300 trains, more than 10 times higher than in 2023. “We are in discussions with China and with our counterparts in Central Asia to reach a minimum of 1,000 block trains next year,” he added. <h3>China attention moves to middle corridor </h3>Also under way is the development of the southern part of the middle corridor that will improve rail connections through Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, with significant investment being made by China in construction of the routes. “China’s participation in the middle corridor is making a huge difference,” Blancas told the summit. “China was primarily focused on the northern corridor for a long time, but over the last couple of years, with what’s going on in Ukraine, the China ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ is really targeting the middle corridor.” But the increase in rail volume flowing across Central Asian countries is placing growing pressure on key transit points. For instance, the Georgian port of Poti on the Black Sea where rail freight is transferred to ships is 99% utilized, according to Blancas. “We are one of the bottlenecks,” acknowledged Mario Escobar, business development manager for APM Terminals Poti. “It’s important that we accept that and work towards fixing it. Today, we have a port that can handle 600,000 TEUs per year, and in 2023 we handled 592,000 TEUs. It is a small port for the cargo that needs to transit this region, and the rail infrastructure is not sufficient to move all that cargo.” APM Terminals is planning to expand the capacity of its Poti terminals to 1.2 million TEUs, but Escobar said the improvement in infrastructure must be accompanied by investment from rail companies into locomotives, wagons and platforms to handle the rising volume. <h3>Reopening Red Sea will see cargo shift to ocean </h3>Martin Koubek, head of the Silk Road for intermodal operator Metrans, said the middle corridor would not be the choice for cargo from China to Europe once most container traffic returned to routing through the Red Sea. “It takes 21 days via the Suez from Shenzhen to Piraeus, so when the Red Sea is again used, why would you send rail cargo on the middle corridor that is longer and more expensive?” he told the Journal of Commerce on the sidelines of the summit. While the shift of cargo from rail to ocean would have a significant impact on the rail business, it would be barely noticed by container shipping with less than 1% of containerized trade between Asia and Europe transported by rail. But Koubek agreed that the middle corridor would be crucial for the Central Asian economies. “They are all growing, and the route will serve their increasing trade with China,” he said. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/rapid-rail-transit-via-sanctions-hit-russia-has-limited-appeal-for-european-shippers-5220672">containerized trade on the northern route from China to North Europe largely dried up</a>. Most of the cargo was moved to ocean but forwarders and rail freight operators began testing the middle corridor that runs from China, through Central Asia, the Caspian Sea, Black Sea and on into Turkey or eastern Europe. There remain significant hurdles to overcome, such as cross border customs issues, multiple cargo handovers from rail to ferry to road and back to rail, high rates and unreliable transit times. Those issues are being addressed by service providers, and the average transit time from Xian to Duisburg in southern Germany is now about 30 days. When the northern route is again fully utilized, most of the China to Europe containerized rail cargo using the middle corridor or ocean will quickly return to the Russian transit route, said Alona Toprak, director at DB Cargo Eurasia. “That means it is really important all the countries in Central Asia work together to address the issues still facing the middle route and increase volume travelling both ways, otherwise the rates will be high, and it won’t make sense,” she said. Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

VIENNA — Geopolitics shaped the middle corridor rail network between China and Europe, but the route has evolved in the past two years from an alternative to the heavily sanctioned northern route through Russia into a critical lifeline for the booming economies of Central Asia. Huge investments are being made across the region as the logistics infrastructure struggles to catch up with demand, attendees at the European Silk Road Summit were told this week. “We see a future for the middle corridor, and we are putting our money where our mouths are and investing billions in projects in Central Asia,” said Luis Blancas, senior transport and logistics specialist at the World Bank. “The middle corridor is an entirely discretionary connection for China, but for Central Asia it is a lifeline connection to the world. It’s a lifeline for Turkey, Azerbaijan, Georgia. They want to trade more with Central Asia and the middle corridor is very important for that.” That the middle corridor was a viable trade route, as well as an improving option for China-Europe shippers, was a theme expressed time and again by speakers at the summit. Emil Mammadov, advisor to the chairman of Azerbaijan Railways, said the future of the middle corridor was “fully related” to the economies of Central Asia where demand was developing fast and rail capacity had to match that growth. “The middle corridor is not just an alternative, it is a working corridor,” he told the summit. “This year to date, we have had more than 260 block trains from China going through Azerbaijan and by the end of December that will have increased to 300 trains, more than 10 times higher than in 2023. “We are in discussions with China and with our counterparts in Central Asia to reach a minimum of 1,000 block trains next year,” he added. China attention moves to middle corridor Also under way is the development of the southern part of the middle corridor that will improve rail connections through Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, with significant investment being made by China in construction of the routes. “China’s participation in the middle corridor is making a huge difference,” Blancas told the summit. “China was primarily focused on the northern corridor for a long time, but over the last couple of years, with what’s going on in Ukraine, the China ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ is really targeting the middle corridor.” But the increase in rail volume flowing across Central Asian countries is placing growing pressure on key transit points. For instance, the Georgian port of Poti on the Black Sea where rail freight is transferred to ships is 99% utilized, according to Blancas. “We are one of the bottlenecks,” acknowledged Mario Escobar, business development manager for APM Terminals Poti. “It’s important that we accept that and work towards fixing it. Today, we have a port that can handle 600,000 TEUs per year, and in 2023 we handled 592,000 TEUs. It is a small port for the cargo that needs to transit this region, and the rail infrastructure is not sufficient to move all that cargo.” APM Terminals is planning to expand the capacity of its Poti terminals to 1.2 million TEUs, but Escobar said the improvement in infrastructure must be accompanied by investment from rail companies into locomotives, wagons and platforms to handle the rising volume. Reopening Red Sea will see cargo shift to ocean Martin Koubek, head of the Silk Road for intermodal operator Metrans, said the middle corridor would not be the choice for cargo from China to Europe once most container traffic returned to routing through the Red Sea. “It takes 21 days via the Suez from Shenzhen to Piraeus, so when the Red Sea is again used, why would you send rail cargo on the middle corridor that is longer and more expensive?” he told the Journal of Commerce on the sidelines of the summit. While the shift of cargo from rail to ocean would have a significant impact on the rail business, it would be barely noticed by container shipping with less than 1% of containerized trade between Asia and Europe transported by rail. But Koubek agreed that the middle corridor would be crucial for the Central Asian economies. “They are all growing, and the route will serve their increasing trade with China,” he said. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, containerized trade on the northern route from China to North Europe largely dried up . Most of the cargo was moved to ocean but forwarders and rail freight operators began testing the middle corridor that runs from China, through Central Asia, the Caspian Sea, Black Sea and on into Turkey or eastern Europe. There remain significant hurdles to overcome, such as cross border customs issues, multiple cargo handovers from rail to ferry to road and back to rail, high rates and unreliable transit times. Those issues are being addressed by service providers, and the average transit time from Xian to Duisburg in southern Germany is now about 30 days. When the northern route is again fully utilized, most of the China to Europe containerized rail cargo using the middle corridor or ocean will quickly return to the Russian transit route, said Alona Toprak, director at DB Cargo Eurasia. “That means it is really important all the countries in Central Asia work together to address the issues still facing the middle route and increase volume travelling both ways, otherwise the rates will be high, and it won’t make sense,” she said. Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com .

Intermodal providers

Booming Central Asian economies lend lifeline to China-Europe rail

Use code CM24W595 at checkout and upgrade to Gold for just $595! Valid for first year of subscription. TODAY ONLY.

Upgrade Subscription - Wide Box

CYBER MONDAY SALE

Use code CM24W30 at checkout and save 30% on any subscription plan! Valid for first year of subscription. TODAY ONLY.

Subscribe Now - Free Trials - Wide Box

Register today to redeem your Gold subscriber discount!

TPM Discount - Gold

Save 20% on TPM25

Subscribe Now - Anonymous - Wide Box

The world of LTL is slow to embrace change. Business anachronisms permeate current supply chain processes. These vestiges of the way things used to work define the LTL freight transportation procurement process of many modern shippers.David Knuth, logistics specialist at IEWC, a global supplier of cable and wire based in Wisconsin, is happy to have modernized the RFP process, automating the entire LTL bidding procedure with Bid$ense, SMC³’s automated truckload and LTL freight transportation sourcing solution. But when prompted, he can still recall what once was.In his previous job, a large part of his duties were consumed by creating an intermodal bid package for carriers. In a spreadsheet, Knuth detailed the company’s volumes lane by lane, taking care to delete any errant keystrokes or misleading data. He would then email out the information to each carrier, taking time to respond to detailed technical questions about the spreadsheet data. Finally, he had to compile all the results, create an algorithm that would compare the carriers on each lane, and award the business.“It was a huge undertaking. It took about four months to do,” Knuth said of the old process. “It was almost a full-time job for that part of the year, every year.”In his new job at IEWC, he sat down with Bid$ense on day one and was amazed at the capabilities. Knuth had never before used a bid tool. SMC³’s latest versions of Bid$ense automate the process even further, taking truckload and LTL RFPs entirely online. The tool draws on RFP best-practices protocols to streamline the bidding communication process, enabling bidding carriers to respond accurately and promptly to shipper requests. The solution also does all the distribution work automatically, electronically submitting shipper bid data to carriers based on their actual service capabilities and performance records. Carriers are alerted with timely prompts for RFP deliverables, so shippers aren’t waiting by the phone for responses.Another benefit of automating the process is the data-cleansing assistance. When Knuth sent spreadsheets to carriers, data errors might cloud the bidding process; he might have to resend data or simply accept a price that did not truly reflect the costs of doing business. Data cleansing is incredibly beneficial, he said.The spreadsheet technique also made bidding analysis an onerous task. Since Bid$ense automates and streamlines the entire RFP process, intensive examination is now simple. SMC³ knows that each bid has more than one best outcome. With uniform responses from each carrier, shippers can quickly rank results and create an unlimited quantity of what-if scenarios to make the optimal procurement decision.Jesse Burnett of Central Garden &amp; Pet experiences many of the same benefits. Founded in 1980, Central Garden &amp; Pet has spent the last three decades growing from a small garden supply company to a provider of a range of products from dog chews and bird seed to soil supplements and natural insecticides. For much of its life, the company shipped these disparate goods via LTL and truckload carriers to retailers throughout the country, relying on each business unit to negotiate directly with their freight transportation providers. This arrangement worked fairly well for a small company, but as Central Garden &amp; Pet expanded, leadership decided to consolidate decision making.Burnett helped centralize the transportation decision making in 2015 with SMC³’s Bid$ense. Before Bid$ense, every business unit operated independently as far as negotiating with carriers.“There were a lot of different things just floating around,” he said. “We didn’t have master agreements in place; no national pricing at all. The pricing from carriers was just all over the place, depending on where you were.”The transformations he saw with Bid$ense were immediate. Burnett has been using the tool about every other year since its implementation at the company. Central Garden and Pet’s $19.6 million 2019 LTL bid saved the company just more than 9 percent when compared to its historical average. For Burnett, though, bid automation extends far beyond savings.“We knew that we weren’t getting the best pricing offer from our carriers just because nothing was centralized,” he continued. “We knew that if we combined everything from all these business units and paired it with one corporate offering, then it would drive some cost benefit with it.”When the company initially decided to centralize bid procurement, executives researched a number of different methodologies and technologies. In the end, though, Burnett found that Bid$ense was both widespread and well known, and that his carrier partners already knew how to use the application. Burnett also highlighted the data-cleansing process as a major benefit, saying the rigorous process ensures that carriers always return the best price.“It definitely has helped drive savings,” he said. “Any time you go out there and you drive that competitiveness with the carriers and they know they’re in a bid environment, it seems to sharpen their pencils.”Transportation procurement is an integral part of the modern supply chain. With Bid$ense, shippers can develop a strategic implementation plan that saves them time and money, but also helps them create strong relationships with their carrier partners. These carriers appreciate the solution’s data-cleansing process; when carriers receive a complete shipment history and future volume forecast, they don’t have to guess on pricing. Carriers that receive more data from shippers get a complete picture of that shipper’s freight, allowing them to accurately plan instead of simply preparing for the worst-case scenario. Clean data presented through an automated system can lead to both bigger shipment savings and a lasting partnership between carrier and customer.Whether customers are looking to streamline over-the-road transportation bidding by automating the RFP process or create an entirely new, centralized sourcing process, Bid$ense has the analytical horsepower to get the job done.SMC³ 2020 Customer Case Study

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046.jpg

Shippers save money, time with automated transportation bidding tools

SSA Marine Mexico has made significant strides in modernizing its infrastructure at the Port of Manzanillo, investing $15 million to enhance operational efficiency and sustainability at its facilities. This move is part of the company's broader strategy to remain at the forefront of the shipping and logistics industry. •	Strengthening Sustainability with Advanced Technology <figure class="joc_admin__inline-image-position-left joc_admin__inline-image-size-medium" data-figure-size="medium" data-figure-position="left"><img src="/content-assets/1730488295264_Cranes%20arrival%20to%20TEC%20I.png" alt="Cranes arrival to TEC I" class="joc_admin__inline-image-inherit"></figure> In July, SSA Marine Mexico added seven state-of-the-art E-RTG (Electric Rubber-Tired Gantry) cranes to its fleet, valued at $14 million. These advanced cranes were distributed across its two terminals: four cranes were assigned to the Multipurpose Terminal, and three to the Specialized Container Terminal I. What sets these cranes apart is their dual-operation capability, allowing them to function either on electric power or diesel fuel. This innovation plays a critical role in reducing the environmental impact of operations, contributing to a 7% increase in energy efficiency. This efficiency improvement is equivalent to eliminating nearly 4,000 tons of CO2 emissions annually, underscoring SSA Marine Mexico's commitment to sustainability. Through this acquisition, SSA Marine Mexico not only enhances its cargo-handling capabilities but also reinforces its leadership in integrating cutting-edge, eco-friendly technology in the maritime industry. The company continues to push the boundaries of efficiency and sustainability, ensuring long-term value for both its customers and the environment. •	Upgraded Facilities to Meet Growing Demand <figure class="joc_admin__inline-image-position-left joc_admin__inline-image-size-medium" data-figure-size="medium" data-figure-position="left"><img src="/content-assets/1730488350634_Multipurpose%20terminal.png" alt="Multipurpose Terminal" class="joc_admin__inline-image-inherit"></figure> In addition to the new cranes, SSA Marine Mexico has completed crucial modernization and repair work across its Multipurpose Terminal and Specialized Facility at the Port of Manzanillo. This $1 million investment targeted critical infrastructure enhancements, focusing on both structural integrity and operational functionality. Key improvements included leveling approximately 12,000 square meters in the dock area, along with the removal of outdated concrete curbs and asphalt layers. The upgraded space now features high-resistance pavers designed to optimize water drainage and prevent pooling, ensuring safer and more efficient operations. Moreover, the Specialized Facility saw significant upgrades, including the leveling of key warehouse areas to facilitate smoother cargo handling processes. These infrastructure improvements directly enhance the handling of TEUS (Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit containers), further demonstrating SSA Marine Mexico's unwavering commitment to continuous modernization, operational safety, and efficiency. With these initiatives, SSA Marine Mexico is well-positioned to meet the growing demands of the global shipping industry while setting new standards in sustainable port operations. LINK:<a href="https://www.ssamarine.mx/ssa-ing/index" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link"> https://www.ssamarine.mx/ssa-ing/index</a>

Cranes arrival to TEC I.png

SSA Marine Mexico Modernizes Facilities with $15 Million Investment 

If there’s one immutable truth in the world of logistics, it’s this: LTL is an inherently complex form of transportation. Tariffs, rates, DIM weights, transit times — it’s enough to confuse even seasoned logistics professionals. The solution to this knowledge gap has historically been on-the-job training or university supply chain education, but for a variety of reasons there is now a pressing need for third-party, remote LTL training that prepares logistics workers for transportation success. Global Scope Can Overlook Local Intricacies In the past, professionals looking to move into a supply chain career learned about the basics of supply chain from universities. However, many of these college supply chain programs are now global in scope, focusing on worldwide supply chain management instead of the intricacies of specialized domestic transportation. And even these programs, which used to be widespread, are becoming less common. LTL is not an industry of broad-brush strokes; supply chain professionals really need a pointillistic understanding of the logistics of LTL in order to excel in the industry. Accelerating Need for Dedicated LTL Education This lack of specified training put the onus on employers to prepare new hires with the LTL knowledge needed to do their jobs. Dedicated LTL study is a necessity, not a luxury. At the same time, changes in LTL and the broader supply chain world are accelerating. The reliance on e-commerce has ballooned since the start of the pandemic, and last-mile LTL shipments and related e-commerce strains on the supply chain won’t diminish once social distancing abates. That genie isn’t going back into the bottle. So supply chain employers need logistics workers that are fully versed in all aspects of the industry, ready to solve unique shipping and delivery problems based on their extensive supply chain knowledge But why care about LTL? It’s been reported that some shippers in today’s world are no longer concerned with what mode is used to ship their goods. A Multimodal Approach Ensures On-Time Delivery This mode agnosticism means supply chain stakeholders have to be well versed in all modes of transportation. As unforeseen weather events and other disruptions, such as protests, become more common, savvy logistics employees will need to be armed with familiarity of all modes, not just the most popular, to ensure that freight is delivered on time, without damage, and in the most financially expedient way possible. Offerings like SMC³’s LTL online education courses cover a wide range of topics from LTL basics and operations to more advanced concepts like pricing analytics and transportation law. The company also has plans to continually refresh content, adding new expert presenters and taking the feedback of students to make the courses even better as time goes on. Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://logisticstrainingcenter.com/smc3-courses/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">SMC³’s LTL Online Education program</a>&nbsp;and view the 2021 hybrid schedule, featuring live industry experts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smc3.com/onlinelearning2021/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">here.</a>

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046 (1).jpg

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

CYBER MONDAY SALE: Use code CM24W595 at checkout and upgrade to Gold for just $595. TODAY ONLY!

Upgrade Subscription - Offer Box

Upgrade Subscription

CYBER MONDAY SALE: Use code CM24W30 at checkout to save 30% on any subscription plan TODAY ONLY!


Subscribe Now - Free Trials - Offer Box

Subscribe Today

20% OFF ON TPM25: Register today and redeem your Gold subscriber discount!

TPM Discount - Gold 

20% OFF ON TPM25

CYBER MONDAY SALE: Use code CM24W30 at checkout to save 30% on any subscription plan TODAY ONLY!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous - Offer Box

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Savings Index

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

QI Report - Rectangle Box

Quarterly Intelligence

The only editorially independent conference for the breakbulk & project cargo industry

Breakbulk Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend Breakbulk25

The premier conference for the global container shipping and supply chain community

TPM Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend TPM25

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

Gateway

The latest container shipping news and analysis of ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, technology solutions and end-to-end connectivity. Coverage includes the movement of containerized cargo handled by marine terminals and container ports, depots, container lines, drayage, consignees, importers and shippers, forwarders, non-vessel operating common carriers (NVOs) and off-dock warehousing providers. The Journal of Commerce's container shipping news includes news from the trans-Pacific, Asia–Europe, North America–Caribbean, Central and South America trades, and intra-Asia trades.

Trans-Atlantic

Asia-Europe

Trans-Pacific

Container shipping news and analysis of ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, technology and end-to-end connectivity.

Container Shipping News | Journal of Commerce

Breakbulk News shipping | Journal of Commerce

Breakbulk News

Stay informed on port news worldwide with Journal of Commerce. From decarbonization to labor updates, get insights on global developments.

Port News | Journal of Commerce

News and analysis of ocean containerized cargo movement, logistics, supply chains, technology, and end-to-end connectivity. Maritime news and analysis of containerized ocean cargo movement, breakbulk and roll-on and roll-off shipping from origin to destination.

Latest News

More News & Analysis

ONE adds to terminal holdings with stake in Indonesian operator

FourKites, project44 resolve legal disputes over defamation, poaching

Co-loader slot deals squeezing pricing power for India-US carriers: forwarders