<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">A House appropriations subcommittee has approved an additional $60 million for the Coast Guard this </div>

A House appropriations subcommittee has approved an additional $60 million for the Coast Guard this

<div>A House appropriations subcommittee has approved an additional $60 million for the Coast Guard this year as part of a funding transfer package that was proposed by the Reagan administration.The Transportation Subcommittee's closed markup last week did not follow all of the guidelines suggested by the administration in its so-called reprogramming request. The reprogramming package called for taking money from other Department of Transportation programs, such as Amtrak and mass transit formula grants, to offset a shortfall in the Coast Guard's fiscal 1988 operating expenses account.About $24 million of the transfer funds will come from other Coast Guard accounts, including...

A House appropriations subcommittee has approved an additional $60 million for the Coast Guard this year as part of a funding transfer package that was proposed by the Reagan administration. The Transportation Subcommittee's closed markup last week did not follow all of the guidelines suggested by the administration in its so-called reprogramming request. The reprogramming package called for taking money from other Department of Transportation programs, such as Amtrak and mass transit formula grants, to offset a shortfall in the Coast Guard's fiscal 1988 operating expenses account.About $24 million of the transfer funds will come from other Coast Guard accounts, including its construction and research and development programs. The bulk of the remaining transfer money will come from unspent mass transit grants and Panama Canal Commission funds. Earlier this year, the Coast Guard closed various facilities and reduced its missions, including drug interdiction, because of the $103 million shortfall. Commandant Paul A. Yost has stated the additional $60 million will avoid further reductions and closings this year. Adm. Yost, who has been a vocal critic of the budget process in general and the transportation subcommittee in particular, reportedly called the panel's action a winner.

Maritime

PANEL OKSCOAST GUARD FUND TRANSFER

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">An oversupply of vessels, carrier rate wars and bleak consumer sentiment are positioned to oppress the container shipping market in 2025, experts told TPM25. </div>

An oversupply of vessels, carrier rate wars and bleak consumer sentiment are positioned to oppress the container shipping market in 2025, experts told TPM25.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">Long Beach, California — The container shipping market is poised to recede this year, and the downcycle could be more severe than prior bear markets, industry experts at the Journal of Commerce’s TPM25 conference said Monday. A container market downcycle is already “well underway,” said Parash Jain, global head of Transport and Logistics Research at HSBC. “This downturn could be worse than past downturns,” said Jain, speaking during a panel session on the container shipping outlook for 2025. <div class="wrapper-narrow float-right-element"><img src="/images/phoenix/5951877_0.1.jpg"></img></div>Jain pointed to several factors that could provide fuel for the downcycle, including uneven demand growth globally, a worsening supply-demand imbalance, a hefty order book that is poised to exacerbate an already significant oversupply issue and increased carrier war chests that could prolong price wars. According to Jain, global nominal fleet growth at 33% far outpaced container trade volume growth of 9% in 2024, although disruptions absorbed much of that extra capacity. If those disruptions recede, oversupply will likely return and drag rates lower, he said. In addition to overcapacity, uneven demand growth globally poses a growing hurdle for the industry. While volumes on the Asia-to-North America trade grew 28% from 2019 to 2024, the North America-Asia lane shrunk 15% and the Europe-Asia trade declined 23% during that same time, Jain said. Unbalanced demand growth worsens the supply-demand imbalance and exacerbates equipment availability hurdles, he said. At the same time, shrinking consumer demand and increasingly aggressive tariffs pose a potential hurdle for the industry this year, according to Chris Rogers, head of supply chain research at S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence. “That’s likely to prove inflationary, which could start to hit consumer spending in a way maybe we didn’t see last time around,” Rogers said. S&amp;P Global is the parent company of the Journal of Commerce. Meanwhile, a US proposal to tax Chinese tonnage and port calls could introduce further uncertainty, said Jain, which is “sufficient enough to create chaos come April.” Still, the proposal’s viability has been met with significant skepticism. The shipping industry is in a “new area of volatility,” said Heather Hwang, head of the sea pricing strategy department at logistics provider LX Pantos. Spot ocean rates in the eastbound trans-Pacific have fallen more than 53% to the US West Coast this year, according to Platts, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&amp;P Global. Contact Laura Robb at <a href="mailto:Laura.Robb@spglobal.com">laura.robb@spglobal.com</a>.  </div>

Long Beach, California — The container shipping market is poised to recede this year, and the downcycle could be more severe than prior bear markets, industry experts at the Journal of Commerce’s TPM25 conference said Monday. A container market downcycle is already “well underway,” said Parash Jain, global head of Transport and Logistics Research at HSBC. “This downturn could be worse than past downturns,” said Jain, speaking during a panel session on the container shipping outlook for 2025. Jain pointed to several factors that could provide fuel for the downcycle, including uneven demand growth globally, a worsening supply-demand imbalance, a hefty order book that is poised to exacerbate an already significant oversupply issue and increased carrier war chests that could prolong price wars. According to Jain, global nominal fleet growth at 33% far outpaced container trade volume growth of 9% in 2024, although disruptions absorbed much of that extra capacity. If those disruptions recede, oversupply will likely return and drag rates lower, he said. In addition to overcapacity, uneven demand growth globally poses a growing hurdle for the industry. While volumes on the Asia-to-North America trade grew 28% from 2019 to 2024, the North America-Asia lane shrunk 15% and the Europe-Asia trade declined 23% during that same time, Jain said. Unbalanced demand growth worsens the supply-demand imbalance and exacerbates equipment availability hurdles, he said. At the same time, shrinking consumer demand and increasingly aggressive tariffs pose a potential hurdle for the industry this year, according to Chris Rogers, head of supply chain research at S&P Global Market Intelligence. “That’s likely to prove inflationary, which could start to hit consumer spending in a way maybe we didn’t see last time around,” Rogers said. S&P Global is the parent company of the Journal of Commerce. Meanwhile, a US proposal to tax Chinese tonnage and port calls could introduce further uncertainty, said Jain, which is “sufficient enough to create chaos come April.” Still, the proposal’s viability has been met with significant skepticism. The shipping industry is in a “new area of volatility,” said Heather Hwang, head of the sea pricing strategy department at logistics provider LX Pantos. Spot ocean rates in the eastbound trans-Pacific have fallen more than 53% to the US West Coast this year, according to Platts, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&P Global. Contact Laura Robb at laura.robb@spglobal.com . 

Supply chain

Container Shipping News

TPM25: Container market downturn creating ‘new era of volatility’

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Truckload spot shipments and pricing in trade corridors such as Toronto-to-Chicago have soared since the US election, but the increases flow in both directions. </div>

Truckload spot shipments and pricing in trade corridors such as Toronto-to-Chicago have soared since the US election, but the increases flow in both directions.

<div class="phx-topic">Truckload volumes and spot rates for freight moving between Canada and the US are surging in advance of US tariffs scheduled to be implemented Tuesday. Dry-van spot-market volumes from Toronto to Chicago rose 57% in the week ending Feb. 28, while rates in the cross-border lane rose 7%, according to DAT Freight &amp; Analytics. US President Donald Trump on Monday afternoon announced that 25% US tariffs on goods imported from Canada and Mexico will indeed take effect March 4 as scheduled. The impact of those potential tariffs — and the possibility of reciprocal tariffs — is already affecting freight and pricing on both sides of the US-Canadian border. Spot rates from the US to Canada on average have climbed 18% since the US election and 6% in the last two weeks to their highest level in two years, DAT said. In Canada, spot rates for US-bound loads are up 7% on average since the election and 5% in the last two weeks, the load-board operator and spot market data provider said. Cross-border freight accounted for an atypical 72% of posted loads in January at Canadian load-board operator Loadlink, a sister company of DAT within Roper Industries. Businesses on both sides of the border are trying to get ahold of critical goods ahead of the Trump administration tariffs, which were postponed last month until March 4. “Many businesses are accelerating their shipments to avoid future cost hikes associated with tariffs,” Loadlink said in its most recent freight report. <h3>Preparing for ‘future complications’ </h3>Loadlink’s Canadian spot market freight index, a measure of volume, jumped 40% in January from December and was up 13% year over year. At the same time, available Canadian spot truck capacity fell 29% year over year in January, despite a 2% increase from December. “The increase in shipping loads, especially across the border, indicates Canadian and American companies are getting ready for any future complications,” Loadlink said. Rate increases for freight headed from the US-Mexican border to US markets have been much more muted than on the US-Canada border, according to DAT. The average rate from Laredo, Texas, the largest US truck border crossing, to Detroit was up only 3 cents per mile over the seven days ending March 3, according to DAT. Laredo-to-Chicago rates rose just 2 cents per mile in the same period, while rates in the shorter haul lane linking Laredo and Dallas rose 4 cents per mile. That reflects the differences in cross-border trucking between the US and Mexico and Canada and the US, with the latter being much more open and fluid. Contact William B. Cassidy at <a href="mailto:bill.cassidy@spglobal.com">bill.cassidy@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

Truckload volumes and spot rates for freight moving between Canada and the US are surging in advance of US tariffs scheduled to be implemented Tuesday. Dry-van spot-market volumes from Toronto to Chicago rose 57% in the week ending Feb. 28, while rates in the cross-border lane rose 7%, according to DAT Freight & Analytics. US President Donald Trump on Monday afternoon announced that 25% US tariffs on goods imported from Canada and Mexico will indeed take effect March 4 as scheduled. The impact of those potential tariffs — and the possibility of reciprocal tariffs — is already affecting freight and pricing on both sides of the US-Canadian border. Spot rates from the US to Canada on average have climbed 18% since the US election and 6% in the last two weeks to their highest level in two years, DAT said. In Canada, spot rates for US-bound loads are up 7% on average since the election and 5% in the last two weeks, the load-board operator and spot market data provider said. Cross-border freight accounted for an atypical 72% of posted loads in January at Canadian load-board operator Loadlink, a sister company of DAT within Roper Industries. Businesses on both sides of the border are trying to get ahold of critical goods ahead of the Trump administration tariffs, which were postponed last month until March 4. “Many businesses are accelerating their shipments to avoid future cost hikes associated with tariffs,” Loadlink said in its most recent freight report. Preparing for ‘future complications’ Loadlink’s Canadian spot market freight index, a measure of volume, jumped 40% in January from December and was up 13% year over year. At the same time, available Canadian spot truck capacity fell 29% year over year in January, despite a 2% increase from December. “The increase in shipping loads, especially across the border, indicates Canadian and American companies are getting ready for any future complications,” Loadlink said. Rate increases for freight headed from the US-Mexican border to US markets have been much more muted than on the US-Canada border, according to DAT. The average rate from Laredo, Texas, the largest US truck border crossing, to Detroit was up only 3 cents per mile over the seven days ending March 3, according to DAT. Laredo-to-Chicago rates rose just 2 cents per mile in the same period, while rates in the shorter haul lane linking Laredo and Dallas rose 4 cents per mile. That reflects the differences in cross-border trucking between the US and Mexico and Canada and the US, with the latter being much more open and fluid. Contact William B. Cassidy at bill.cassidy@spglobal.com .

Trucking News

Truckload

Surface

Potential US tariffs ignite US-Canada cross-border spot truck rates, volumes

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Should the Trump administration’s proposal be implemented, capacity will have to be withdrawn from the US and redeployed to where it makes more economical sense, the CEO of the world’s largest ocean carrier said.</div>

Should the Trump administration’s proposal be implemented, capacity will have to be withdrawn from the US and redeployed to where it makes more economical sense, the CEO of the world’s largest ocean carrier said.

<div class="phx-topic">Long Beach, California — Mediterranean Shipping Co. will need to withdraw tonnage and drastically revise its US coverage if the Trump administration’s proposal to tax Chinese-built and -operated ships calling US ports is implemented, CEO Soren Toft told the Journal of Commerce’s TPM25 conference Monday. The head of the world’s largest ocean carrier said the significant costs that would be imposed on carriers — in excess of $1 million per US port rotation — would make some routes unviable. <div class="wrapper-narrow float-right-element"><img src="/images/phoenix/5951877_0.1.jpg"></img></div>“The trans-Atlantic will be uneconomical if we can’t pass on the costs, so we would have to withdraw that capacity and deploy it where it makes more sense,” Toft warned, adding that the “marginal ports” in US strings would have to be looked at. “In California today we typically call at Long Beach then proceed to Oakland,” he said. “But we can’t proceed to Oakland if that costs us another $1 million. A lot of the marginal ports, the peripheral ports, will be at risk and we will have to adapt our services.” Following the conclusion of an investigation into anti-competitive practices of China’s shipbuilding industry that was initiated during the Biden administration, the US Trade Representative (USTR) last month <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/us-port-fees-could-hit-chinese-ships-under-trump-trade-proposal-5949409">released its suggested remedies</a>, including fees up to $1 million for Chinese-operated ships calling US ports. Toft provided an example of the costs that would need to be passed on to cargo owners. “If we look at a service going from Asia to the US East Coast, most of the carriers deploy 8,000-TEU to 15,000-TEU tonnage calling at probably four ports,” he said. “With this new regulation that imposes a cost of $1 million per port call, that’s $4 million. If you move an average volume of 10,000 TEUs, it is $800 per 40-foot container.” At current US East Coast rates, Toft said that would be close to a 25% increase. But he said the impact on the trans-Atlantic would be even more severe. “If we go to the trans-Atlantic, it gets even worse,” he said. “We are moving 4,000 to 5,000 TEUs and we also call four ports, so that cost will be $1,000 per FEU, which more or less eliminates the freight rate.” <h3>Port congestion would result </h3>The deadline to submit industry comments on the USTR proposal is at the end of March. The World Shipping Council — of which Toft is the chairman — labeled the move as “draconian,” while Jonathan Gold, the National Retail Federation’s vice president of supply chain and customs policy, called for the industry to stand up and “make its voice heard.” Toft said if the costs of the USTR proposal could not be passed on to customers, the modifications to carrier networks could lead to fast-growing bottlenecks as volume was rerouted. “If we continue to serve trades with fewer ports ... we could very quickly enter a situation where there will be port congestion,” he said. “We won’t need much more than a 5% to 10% increase in volume for things to change.” Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

Long Beach, California — Mediterranean Shipping Co. will need to withdraw tonnage and drastically revise its US coverage if the Trump administration’s proposal to tax Chinese-built and -operated ships calling US ports is implemented, CEO Soren Toft told the Journal of Commerce’s TPM25 conference Monday. The head of the world’s largest ocean carrier said the significant costs that would be imposed on carriers — in excess of $1 million per US port rotation — would make some routes unviable. “The trans-Atlantic will be uneconomical if we can’t pass on the costs, so we would have to withdraw that capacity and deploy it where it makes more sense,” Toft warned, adding that the “marginal ports” in US strings would have to be looked at. “In California today we typically call at Long Beach then proceed to Oakland,” he said. “But we can’t proceed to Oakland if that costs us another $1 million. A lot of the marginal ports, the peripheral ports, will be at risk and we will have to adapt our services.” Following the conclusion of an investigation into anti-competitive practices of China’s shipbuilding industry that was initiated during the Biden administration, the US Trade Representative (USTR) last month released its suggested remedies , including fees up to $1 million for Chinese-operated ships calling US ports. Toft provided an example of the costs that would need to be passed on to cargo owners. “If we look at a service going from Asia to the US East Coast, most of the carriers deploy 8,000-TEU to 15,000-TEU tonnage calling at probably four ports,” he said. “With this new regulation that imposes a cost of $1 million per port call, that’s $4 million. If you move an average volume of 10,000 TEUs, it is $800 per 40-foot container.” At current US East Coast rates, Toft said that would be close to a 25% increase. But he said the impact on the trans-Atlantic would be even more severe. “If we go to the trans-Atlantic, it gets even worse,” he said. “We are moving 4,000 to 5,000 TEUs and we also call four ports, so that cost will be $1,000 per FEU, which more or less eliminates the freight rate.” Port congestion would result The deadline to submit industry comments on the USTR proposal is at the end of March. The World Shipping Council — of which Toft is the chairman — labeled the move as “draconian,” while Jonathan Gold, the National Retail Federation’s vice president of supply chain and customs policy, called for the industry to stand up and “make its voice heard.” Toft said if the costs of the USTR proposal could not be passed on to customers, the modifications to carrier networks could lead to fast-growing bottlenecks as volume was rerouted. “If we continue to serve trades with fewer ports ... we could very quickly enter a situation where there will be port congestion,” he said. “We won’t need much more than a 5% to 10% increase in volume for things to change.” Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com .

Port News

Transport, Trade and Regulation News

Container lines

North American ports

TPM25: Port tax on Chinese ships will make some routes unviable: MSC’s Toft

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump’s national security advisor from 2018–19, said China is gauging its next global moves through how the US responds to the war in the Ukraine.</div>

John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump’s national security advisor from 2018–19, said China is gauging its next global moves through how the US responds to the war in the Ukraine.

<div class="phx-topic">Long Beach, California — The Trump administration’s moves to withdraw the US from long-standing alliances and security guarantees puts global supply chains more at risk, former national security advisor and UN ambassador John Bolton said Monday. US naval power, which guarantees freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, is also currently inadequate to counter global threats, Bolton told the Journal of Commerce’s TPM25 conference here. <div class="wrapper-narrow float-right-element"><img src="/images/phoenix/5951877_0.1.jpg"></img></div>Bolton said Russia, China and Iran face their own weaknesses in the long term that could stem their hegemonic ambitions across the world. But the US is not currently able to capitalize on those weaknesses due to Donald Trump’s threats to withdraw from NATO and his wavering of US support for Taiwan. “I don’t think it’s inevitable that we will retreat further,” Bolton said. “I think the answer to that question is obvious: A weaker America leads to a more unstable world, a more chaotic world, or a world where our adversaries step into the vacuum.” Bolton, who served as Trump’s national security advisor from 2018–19, said China is gauging its next global moves through how the US responds to the war in the Ukraine. The Trump administration’s signaling of support for Russia and threats to withdraw military aid for Ukraine prod China to further its global aims, he said. Along with China’s goal to reunite Taiwan with the mainland, Bolton said China is also threatening Japan and South Korea’s commercial shipping lanes through building military bases and asserting territorial claims in the eastern Pacific. Yet the Trump administration appears non-committal on supporting its Indo-Pacific allies against China, he said. Bolton said Trump resents Taiwan’s leading market share in the semiconductor industry and publicly questioned the value of defending Taiwan, given its small size relative to China. Trump also expressed ignorance about the 2021 agreement between the US, United Kingdom and Australia to defend freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region. “That has an enormous potential impact on ships that are sailing through those waters carrying commerce to Japan, South Korea and Taiwan,” Bolton said. A direct attack on Taiwan by China is not likely as a war would destroy much of the island’s factories and other productive capacity that China ultimately wants, Bolton said. It’s more likely China would use a pretext for launching a naval blockade of the island, waiting to see if the US will respond. <h3>‘American weakness is provocative’ </h3>Other non-US moves also put commercial shipping lanes at risk, Bolton said. The UK is ceding control of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean to the local population, which could jeopardize the future of a US military base on Diego Garcia. Bolton said ceding control of the Chagos Islands could allow the Chinese to assert more power in the Indian Ocean. However, many of the world’s aggressors face their own problems. Bolton said Russia and Iran’s regimes have weak governance structures that could mean power vacuums once their current leaders are gone. China, too, faces a population decline and the resulting economic problems that could hinder its global ambitions. Bolton said there’s an opportunity for Israel to launch attacks on Iran’s nuclear capability now. That would undermine Iran’s ability to support Yemen’s Houthi rebels, potentially reducing the attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. The US, though, is not well placed currently to assert freedom-of-navigation for commercial shipping, Bolton said, citing a nearly 100-ship deficit in the US Navy’s fleet. Reversing that decline and reasserting global alliances requires serious thought about America’s role in the world, he said. “American strength is not provocative,” Bolton said. “American weakness is provocative and we’re showing a lot of provocation these days.” Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a>.</div>

Long Beach, California — The Trump administration’s moves to withdraw the US from long-standing alliances and security guarantees puts global supply chains more at risk, former national security advisor and UN ambassador John Bolton said Monday. US naval power, which guarantees freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, is also currently inadequate to counter global threats, Bolton told the Journal of Commerce’s TPM25 conference here. Bolton said Russia, China and Iran face their own weaknesses in the long term that could stem their hegemonic ambitions across the world. But the US is not currently able to capitalize on those weaknesses due to Donald Trump’s threats to withdraw from NATO and his wavering of US support for Taiwan. “I don’t think it’s inevitable that we will retreat further,” Bolton said. “I think the answer to that question is obvious: A weaker America leads to a more unstable world, a more chaotic world, or a world where our adversaries step into the vacuum.” Bolton, who served as Trump’s national security advisor from 2018–19, said China is gauging its next global moves through how the US responds to the war in the Ukraine. The Trump administration’s signaling of support for Russia and threats to withdraw military aid for Ukraine prod China to further its global aims, he said. Along with China’s goal to reunite Taiwan with the mainland, Bolton said China is also threatening Japan and South Korea’s commercial shipping lanes through building military bases and asserting territorial claims in the eastern Pacific. Yet the Trump administration appears non-committal on supporting its Indo-Pacific allies against China, he said. Bolton said Trump resents Taiwan’s leading market share in the semiconductor industry and publicly questioned the value of defending Taiwan, given its small size relative to China. Trump also expressed ignorance about the 2021 agreement between the US, United Kingdom and Australia to defend freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific region. “That has an enormous potential impact on ships that are sailing through those waters carrying commerce to Japan, South Korea and Taiwan,” Bolton said. A direct attack on Taiwan by China is not likely as a war would destroy much of the island’s factories and other productive capacity that China ultimately wants, Bolton said. It’s more likely China would use a pretext for launching a naval blockade of the island, waiting to see if the US will respond. ‘American weakness is provocative’ Other non-US moves also put commercial shipping lanes at risk, Bolton said. The UK is ceding control of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean to the local population, which could jeopardize the future of a US military base on Diego Garcia. Bolton said ceding control of the Chagos Islands could allow the Chinese to assert more power in the Indian Ocean. However, many of the world’s aggressors face their own problems. Bolton said Russia and Iran’s regimes have weak governance structures that could mean power vacuums once their current leaders are gone. China, too, faces a population decline and the resulting economic problems that could hinder its global ambitions. Bolton said there’s an opportunity for Israel to launch attacks on Iran’s nuclear capability now. That would undermine Iran’s ability to support Yemen’s Houthi rebels, potentially reducing the attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. The US, though, is not well placed currently to assert freedom-of-navigation for commercial shipping, Bolton said, citing a nearly 100-ship deficit in the US Navy’s fleet. Reversing that decline and reasserting global alliances requires serious thought about America’s role in the world, he said. “American strength is not provocative,” Bolton said. “American weakness is provocative and we’re showing a lot of provocation these days.” Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com .

TPM25: Growing US isolationism threatens global supply chains: Bolton

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The carrier’s new investment push seems to be an attempt to catch up with its peers, particularly MSC, which has dedicated terminals at Mundra and Ennore/Chennai through joint venture arrangements with Adani.</div>

The carrier’s new investment push seems to be an attempt to catch up with its peers, particularly MSC, which has dedicated terminals at Mundra and Ennore/Chennai through joint venture arrangements with Adani.

<div class="phx-topic">Maersk is <a href="https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.joc.com%2Farticle%2Fmaersk-joins-indian-shipbuilding-race-amid-government-incentives-china-pivot-5946747&amp;data=05%7C02%7Ckevin.saville2%40spglobal.com%7Cbf795d5cb03144ea34aa08dd5a480169%7C8f3e36ea80394b4081a77dc0599e8645%7C1%7C0%7C638765987479319448%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=%2Fn%2BHDOUKGomlVGJNspO46t3aciIhCJsbhyq9imu8ZpU%3D&amp;reserved=0">amplifying its Indian playbook</a> amid strong trade growth expectations propelled by diversifying Asian supply chains and new industry competition as ocean network dynamics resettle. The Danish carrier has committed a further $5 billion investment in the development of ports and other inland infrastructure projects in India, company officials told the Journal of Commerce Friday at the naming ceremony for the dual-fuel Albert Maersk in Nhava Sheva Port (Mumbai). “India is among the world’s fastest-growing major economies, with a thriving manufacturing sector, a booming e-commerce industry and expanding exports,” said Maersk CEO Vincent Clerc. “Shipping and logistics are high on India’s priorities, and Maersk looks forward to partnering with India on various aspects.” In the first phase, the group plans to enhance cargo infrastructure at APM Terminals Pipavav, adding berths and deepening the channel beyond its current 48 feet at an estimated cost of $2 billion. This push comes as APM’s concession rights at Pipavav are due to end in 2028, thus potentially creating a case for renewal. Equipped with multipurpose facilities that include a 1.35-million-TEU container terminal, Pipavav is facing fierce regional competitive challenges for box trade growth, especially from Adani Ports’ Mundra Port. Maersk/APM operations in India include Gateway Terminals India at Nhava Sheva and 26 warehousing depots with the combined space totaling 350,000 square meters. “We believe we can play a role in reducing the cost of logistics by ensuring that our customers access all their supply chain needs in one place — from all modes of transportation to port handling to warehousing and distribution,” APM CEO Keith Svendsen told the Journal of Commerce. “We are ready to invest more in developing ports with low emissions and great efficiency that will help businesses grow and connect India with the global markets.” Officials also indicated Maersk’s interest in the <a href="https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.joc.com%2Farticle%2Findia-greenlights-9-billion-deep-sea-port-off-jnpt-to-attract-larger-calls-5243629&amp;data=05%7C02%7Ckevin.saville2%40spglobal.com%7Cbf795d5cb03144ea34aa08dd5a480169%7C8f3e36ea80394b4081a77dc0599e8645%7C1%7C0%7C638765987479338303%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=HhX4jSwuknvMDjVQouHcebsFmIKvin7Mfp3Rx3%2FQVX8%3D&amp;reserved=0">Vadhavan Port project</a> near Nhava Sheva, and in extending its reach to the country’s East Coast, potentially in a minor port in Andhra Pradesh. The Albert Maersk is the 11th 16,592-TEU vessel in the carrier’s 18-ship order of dual-fuel methanol vessels scheduled for delivery through 2025 and joins the Angelica Maersk as part of the ME11 (India/Europe) service fleet. “Although vessel capacities have by now already reached optimal levels, new generation vessels with alternate fuels are the need of the hour,” Sunil Vaswani, executive director of the Container Shipping Lines Association (India), told the Journal of Commerce. <h3>Keeping up with competitors </h3>On a broader view, Maersk’s new investment push seems to be an attempt to catch up with its peers, particularly Mediterranean Shipping Co. MSC has dedicated terminals at Mundra and Ennore/Chennai through joint venture arrangements with Adani, as well as at Tuticorin via the Bollore Africa acquisition. CMA CGM also has a joint venture with Adani at Mundra and runs a terminal at Nhava Sheva in partnership with Mumbai-based JM Baxi Group, while Maersk’s Gemini partner Hapag-Lloyd owns 40% of JM Ports &amp; Logistics, which holds terminal concessions at multiple locations in India. Contact Bency Mathew at <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/bencyvmathew@gmail.com">bencyvmathew@gmail.com</a>.</div>

Maersk is amplifying its Indian playbook amid strong trade growth expectations propelled by diversifying Asian supply chains and new industry competition as ocean network dynamics resettle. The Danish carrier has committed a further $5 billion investment in the development of ports and other inland infrastructure projects in India, company officials told the Journal of Commerce Friday at the naming ceremony for the dual-fuel Albert Maersk in Nhava Sheva Port (Mumbai). “India is among the world’s fastest-growing major economies, with a thriving manufacturing sector, a booming e-commerce industry and expanding exports,” said Maersk CEO Vincent Clerc. “Shipping and logistics are high on India’s priorities, and Maersk looks forward to partnering with India on various aspects.” In the first phase, the group plans to enhance cargo infrastructure at APM Terminals Pipavav, adding berths and deepening the channel beyond its current 48 feet at an estimated cost of $2 billion. This push comes as APM’s concession rights at Pipavav are due to end in 2028, thus potentially creating a case for renewal. Equipped with multipurpose facilities that include a 1.35-million-TEU container terminal, Pipavav is facing fierce regional competitive challenges for box trade growth, especially from Adani Ports’ Mundra Port. Maersk/APM operations in India include Gateway Terminals India at Nhava Sheva and 26 warehousing depots with the combined space totaling 350,000 square meters. “We believe we can play a role in reducing the cost of logistics by ensuring that our customers access all their supply chain needs in one place — from all modes of transportation to port handling to warehousing and distribution,” APM CEO Keith Svendsen told the Journal of Commerce. “We are ready to invest more in developing ports with low emissions and great efficiency that will help businesses grow and connect India with the global markets.” Officials also indicated Maersk’s interest in the Vadhavan Port project near Nhava Sheva, and in extending its reach to the country’s East Coast, potentially in a minor port in Andhra Pradesh. The Albert Maersk is the 11th 16,592-TEU vessel in the carrier’s 18-ship order of dual-fuel methanol vessels scheduled for delivery through 2025 and joins the Angelica Maersk as part of the ME11 (India/Europe) service fleet. “Although vessel capacities have by now already reached optimal levels, new generation vessels with alternate fuels are the need of the hour,” Sunil Vaswani, executive director of the Container Shipping Lines Association (India), told the Journal of Commerce. Keeping up with competitors On a broader view, Maersk’s new investment push seems to be an attempt to catch up with its peers, particularly Mediterranean Shipping Co. MSC has dedicated terminals at Mundra and Ennore/Chennai through joint venture arrangements with Adani, as well as at Tuticorin via the Bollore Africa acquisition. CMA CGM also has a joint venture with Adani at Mundra and runs a terminal at Nhava Sheva in partnership with Mumbai-based JM Baxi Group, while Maersk’s Gemini partner Hapag-Lloyd owns 40% of JM Ports & Logistics, which holds terminal concessions at multiple locations in India. Contact Bency Mathew at bencyvmathew@gmail.com .

International ports

Maersk tees up $5 billion investment plan for Indian market expansion

Arm your team with the most trusted information portal for the international container shipping industry.

Group Subscriptions - Wide Box

Get into a group subscription today

Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Wide Box

START A FREE TRIAL TODAY

Use code STSW20 at checkout to save 20% on the first year of any annual subscription! 

Subscribe Now - Free Trials - Wide Box

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE

Subscribe Now - Anonymous - Wide Box

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of an annual Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription - Gold Trials

Become a Gold Subscriber and Save!

Use code GUW795 at checkout and save $700 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription - Wide Box

UPGRADE AND SAVE

The world of LTL is slow to embrace change. Business anachronisms permeate current supply chain processes. These vestiges of the way things used to work define the LTL freight transportation procurement process of many modern shippers.David Knuth, logistics specialist at IEWC, a global supplier of cable and wire based in Wisconsin, is happy to have modernized the RFP process, automating the entire LTL bidding procedure with Bid$ense, SMC³’s automated truckload and LTL freight transportation sourcing solution. But when prompted, he can still recall what once was.In his previous job, a large part of his duties were consumed by creating an intermodal bid package for carriers. In a spreadsheet, Knuth detailed the company’s volumes lane by lane, taking care to delete any errant keystrokes or misleading data. He would then email out the information to each carrier, taking time to respond to detailed technical questions about the spreadsheet data. Finally, he had to compile all the results, create an algorithm that would compare the carriers on each lane, and award the business.“It was a huge undertaking. It took about four months to do,” Knuth said of the old process. “It was almost a full-time job for that part of the year, every year.”In his new job at IEWC, he sat down with Bid$ense on day one and was amazed at the capabilities. Knuth had never before used a bid tool. SMC³’s latest versions of Bid$ense automate the process even further, taking truckload and LTL RFPs entirely online. The tool draws on RFP best-practices protocols to streamline the bidding communication process, enabling bidding carriers to respond accurately and promptly to shipper requests. The solution also does all the distribution work automatically, electronically submitting shipper bid data to carriers based on their actual service capabilities and performance records. Carriers are alerted with timely prompts for RFP deliverables, so shippers aren’t waiting by the phone for responses.Another benefit of automating the process is the data-cleansing assistance. When Knuth sent spreadsheets to carriers, data errors might cloud the bidding process; he might have to resend data or simply accept a price that did not truly reflect the costs of doing business. Data cleansing is incredibly beneficial, he said.The spreadsheet technique also made bidding analysis an onerous task. Since Bid$ense automates and streamlines the entire RFP process, intensive examination is now simple. SMC³ knows that each bid has more than one best outcome. With uniform responses from each carrier, shippers can quickly rank results and create an unlimited quantity of what-if scenarios to make the optimal procurement decision.Jesse Burnett of Central Garden &amp; Pet experiences many of the same benefits. Founded in 1980, Central Garden &amp; Pet has spent the last three decades growing from a small garden supply company to a provider of a range of products from dog chews and bird seed to soil supplements and natural insecticides. For much of its life, the company shipped these disparate goods via LTL and truckload carriers to retailers throughout the country, relying on each business unit to negotiate directly with their freight transportation providers. This arrangement worked fairly well for a small company, but as Central Garden &amp; Pet expanded, leadership decided to consolidate decision making.Burnett helped centralize the transportation decision making in 2015 with SMC³’s Bid$ense. Before Bid$ense, every business unit operated independently as far as negotiating with carriers.“There were a lot of different things just floating around,” he said. “We didn’t have master agreements in place; no national pricing at all. The pricing from carriers was just all over the place, depending on where you were.”The transformations he saw with Bid$ense were immediate. Burnett has been using the tool about every other year since its implementation at the company. Central Garden and Pet’s $19.6 million 2019 LTL bid saved the company just more than 9 percent when compared to its historical average. For Burnett, though, bid automation extends far beyond savings.“We knew that we weren’t getting the best pricing offer from our carriers just because nothing was centralized,” he continued. “We knew that if we combined everything from all these business units and paired it with one corporate offering, then it would drive some cost benefit with it.”When the company initially decided to centralize bid procurement, executives researched a number of different methodologies and technologies. In the end, though, Burnett found that Bid$ense was both widespread and well known, and that his carrier partners already knew how to use the application. Burnett also highlighted the data-cleansing process as a major benefit, saying the rigorous process ensures that carriers always return the best price.“It definitely has helped drive savings,” he said. “Any time you go out there and you drive that competitiveness with the carriers and they know they’re in a bid environment, it seems to sharpen their pencils.”Transportation procurement is an integral part of the modern supply chain. With Bid$ense, shippers can develop a strategic implementation plan that saves them time and money, but also helps them create strong relationships with their carrier partners. These carriers appreciate the solution’s data-cleansing process; when carriers receive a complete shipment history and future volume forecast, they don’t have to guess on pricing. Carriers that receive more data from shippers get a complete picture of that shipper’s freight, allowing them to accurately plan instead of simply preparing for the worst-case scenario. Clean data presented through an automated system can lead to both bigger shipment savings and a lasting partnership between carrier and customer.Whether customers are looking to streamline over-the-road transportation bidding by automating the RFP process or create an entirely new, centralized sourcing process, Bid$ense has the analytical horsepower to get the job done.SMC³ 2020 Customer Case Study

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046.jpg

Shippers save money, time with automated transportation bidding tools

If there’s one immutable truth in the world of logistics, it’s this: LTL is an inherently complex form of transportation. Tariffs, rates, DIM weights, transit times — it’s enough to confuse even seasoned logistics professionals. The solution to this knowledge gap has historically been on-the-job training or university supply chain education, but for a variety of reasons there is now a pressing need for third-party, remote LTL training that prepares logistics workers for transportation success. Global Scope Can Overlook Local Intricacies In the past, professionals looking to move into a supply chain career learned about the basics of supply chain from universities. However, many of these college supply chain programs are now global in scope, focusing on worldwide supply chain management instead of the intricacies of specialized domestic transportation. And even these programs, which used to be widespread, are becoming less common. LTL is not an industry of broad-brush strokes; supply chain professionals really need a pointillistic understanding of the logistics of LTL in order to excel in the industry. Accelerating Need for Dedicated LTL Education This lack of specified training put the onus on employers to prepare new hires with the LTL knowledge needed to do their jobs. Dedicated LTL study is a necessity, not a luxury. At the same time, changes in LTL and the broader supply chain world are accelerating. The reliance on e-commerce has ballooned since the start of the pandemic, and last-mile LTL shipments and related e-commerce strains on the supply chain won’t diminish once social distancing abates. That genie isn’t going back into the bottle. So supply chain employers need logistics workers that are fully versed in all aspects of the industry, ready to solve unique shipping and delivery problems based on their extensive supply chain knowledge But why care about LTL? It’s been reported that some shippers in today’s world are no longer concerned with what mode is used to ship their goods. A Multimodal Approach Ensures On-Time Delivery This mode agnosticism means supply chain stakeholders have to be well versed in all modes of transportation. As unforeseen weather events and other disruptions, such as protests, become more common, savvy logistics employees will need to be armed with familiarity of all modes, not just the most popular, to ensure that freight is delivered on time, without damage, and in the most financially expedient way possible. Offerings like SMC³’s LTL online education courses cover a wide range of topics from LTL basics and operations to more advanced concepts like pricing analytics and transportation law. The company also has plans to continually refresh content, adding new expert presenters and taking the feedback of students to make the courses even better as time goes on. Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://logisticstrainingcenter.com/smc3-courses/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">SMC³’s LTL Online Education program</a>&nbsp;and view the 2021 hybrid schedule, featuring live industry experts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smc3.com/onlinelearning2021/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">here.</a>

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046 (1).jpg

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

SUBSCRIBE TODAY: Choose a plan that works best for you!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous - Offer Box

Subscribe Today

START A FREE TRIAL: Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Offer Box

Free Trial

UPGRADE AND SAVE: Use code GUW795 at checkout and save $700 on first year of a Gold subscription! 

Upgrade Subscription - Offer Box

Upgrade Subscription

GET INTO A GROUP SUBSCRIPTION: Arm your team with unlimited Journal of Commerce content

Group Subscriptions - Offer Box

Group Subscriptions

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of a Gold subscription!

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE: Use code STSW20 at checkout to save 20% on first year of any subscription plan!


Subscribe Now - Free Trials - Offer Box

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

The only editorially independent conference for the breakbulk & project cargo industry

Breakbulk Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend Breakbulk25

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Savings Index

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

Gateway

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

QI Report - Rectangle Box

Quarterly Intelligence

Breakbulk News shipping | Journal of Commerce

Breakbulk News

Container shipping news and analysis of ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, technology and end-to-end connectivity.

Container Shipping News | Journal of Commerce

Stay informed on port news worldwide with Journal of Commerce. From decarbonization to labor updates, get insights on global developments.

Port News | Journal of Commerce

News and analysis of ocean containerized cargo movement, logistics, supply chains, technology, and end-to-end connectivity. Maritime news and analysis of containerized ocean cargo movement, breakbulk and roll-on and roll-off shipping from origin to destination.

Latest News

Intermodal Service Scorecard

Shippers save money, time with automated transportation bidding tools

More News & Analysis

TPM25: Container market downturn creating ‘new era of volatility’

Potential US tariffs ignite US-Canada cross-border spot truck rates, volumes

TPM25: Port tax on Chinese ships will make some routes unviable: MSC’s Toft