<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The service efficiency of the port can be reflected by the time cost of the ship in port.</div>

The service efficiency of the port can be reflected by the time cost of the ship in port.

<div>Efficiency Evaluation of Global 20 Major Container Ports Based on AIS DataAs the port customer, the shipping company would like to judge the service quality of a port in two aspects: time and cost, and even will be more sensitive to time requirements. The service efficiency of the port can be reflected by the time cost of the ship in port. In general, the services provided by the port for ships can be divided into two categories: berth loading and unloading services and ancillary services. Therefore, this paper focus on the efficiency analysis of berth loading and unloading services and...

Efficiency Evaluation of Global 20 Major Container Ports Based on AIS Data As the port customer, the shipping company would like to judge the service quality of a port in two aspects: time and cost, and even will be more sensitive to time requirements. The service efficiency of the port can be reflected by the time cost of the ship in port. In general, the services provided by the port for ships can be divided into two categories: berth loading and unloading services and ancillary services. Therefore, this paper focus on the efficiency analysis of berth loading and unloading services and also the ancillary services. This paper selects the container ports ranking high in terms of container throughput as the research objects. The original data is collected from the ships engaged in international route from January to December 2017. 1. Berth Loading and Unloading Time Cost Analysis (1) The berth loading and unloading time cost of arrival ships in each port is very close. The berth loading and unloading time cost of ship is relative with the amount of containers that the ship handled in a port. However, it is meaningful to compare the loading and unloading time cost of similar type ships for the ports with same throughput scale. According to the research, it can be found that the port in the same throughput scale has similar performance in terms of berth loading and unloading time. For example, for a ship of 0-4,000 TEU, the berth loading and unloading time is about 8-15 hours, and for a 4,000-8,000TEU ship, it is usually about 10-16 hours. The efficiency of loading and unloading operations is closely related to the number of shore bridges and operating systems of port. And with the development of technology, the technical differences in global major container ports are tiny, so there is no significant difference in berth loading and unloading efficiency. (2) The berth loading and unloading time of American ports is higher than that of others. Among the 20 major container ports in the world, the berth loading and unloading efficiency of American ports is significantly lower than that of other ports. For example, for a container ship of 0-4,000 TEU, the berth loading and unloading time of several ports in the United States is almost three times than that of the most efficient port. And a ship on or above 8,000 TEU needs stay in berths for up to 7 days. Although compared with Chinese ports, US ports have relatively high loading and unloading capacity for a single large ship, but the difference between the scale and time is not proportional. (3)China's major container ports has higher loading and unloading efficiency. On the contrast, the loading and unloading efficiency of the main container ports in China is generally high, and the operation of container ports in other regions is relatively backward. On one hand, China's container ports above designated size are densely distributed, which divert the volume of container ships, resulting in a relatively short loading and unloading time for single ships at berth. On the other hand, technology and operation level of Chinese ports are indeed leading the world, and the short berth loading and unloading time cost is a relatively favorable proof. (4) The longer time for ships in Singapore Port is due to its comprehensive service supply. Compared with other international container hubs such as Hong Kong Port and Shanghai Port, the loading and unloading time for ships in Singapore Port is relatively long. The main reason is that Singapore Port is an international supply port, which can provide other services, including ship supply and maintenance after the ship is docked. According to statistics, after arrival in Singapore Port, 36.2% vessels carried out refueling and loading and unloading services at the same time, 4.5 percent of vessels carried out cargo handling and material supply, 10.8% of the vessels carried out the above three services, while just 32.8% vessels only for cargo handling. 2. Port Auxiliary Service Time Cost Analysis Port auxiliary services include towing, pilotage, mooring, port inspection, etc. Therefore, by processing AIS data, the time statistics of ships from entering the port to leaving the port with the loading and unloading time eliminating are collected. (1) Small ships operations often require more mooring time. It can be found that container ships below 4,000 TEU generally require longer non-berthing auxiliary service time than other types’ ship. The global major container hub ports often take precedence over the calling of large ships. Therefore, the time cost of small vessels in port is often affected under the limitation of berth. (2) Auxiliary service time is longer for the ports at the junction of rivers and seas Port of Rotterdam, Hamburg, Antwerp, and Guangzhou have longer auxiliary service time for each type of ship than other ports. The reason is that the distribution of the berths is dumbbell-shaped, except for the berths at outermost seaside piers, some berths are located in the places where the ships need longer time to pass through. And the service such as towing and pilotage often need a long time for ships. The ports located in the inland rivers are often berthed by small vessels below 4,000 TEU due to water depth restrictions. (3) American Ports performed more efficiency in port auxiliary services. Although the loading and unloading time is longer for the ships operated in the ports of United State, the auxiliary service time is shorter and the relative efficiency is higher than that of others. For example, the Port of New York & New Jersey, and the Port of Los Angeles ranked in the top ten by auxiliary operation time, and even ranked top five under special ship type among the global 20 major ports. 3. Arrival Vessels’ Structure Analysis of Global 20 Major Container Ports Click to enlarge (1) Singapore Port is the busiest port in the world. Judging from the scale of arrival ships, these 20 ports can be divided into three echelons. The first echelon, represented by Singapore Port, Shanghai Port, Shenzhen Port, Hong Kong Port, Busan Port and Ningbo Port, can reach more than 10,000 of container vessels in 2017. Rotterdam Port, Kaohsiung Port, Qingdao Port and Xiamen Port form the second echelon with the number of ship arrival between 5,000 and 10,000 ships. Antwerp Port, Tianjin Port, Guangzhou Port, Dubai Port, Tanjung Pelepas Port, Hamburg Port, Dalian Port, Port of New York and New Jersey, Port of Los Angeles, and Port of Long Beach are the third echelon, with less than 5,000 ship arrival in 2017. Among those ports, Singapore Port is undoubtedly the busiest port in terms of the number of arrival ships. (2) Shenzhen Port, Shanghai Port, Singapore Port, and Ningbo Port are the typical handling ports for very-large ships. According to the analysis of statistical data, the very-large vessels on or above 12,000 TEU are mainly engaged in the Asia-Europe route. For the number of arrival ships on or above 12,000 TEU, each of Shenzhen Port, Shanghai Port, Singapore Port and Ningbo Port has more than 1,000 callings in 2017. Shenzhen unexpectedly became the most popular port to call for the ships on or above 12,000 TEU. Furthermore, in East Asia, and the container ships on or above 18,000 TEU can only be handled in Shenzhen Port, Shanghai Port, Ningbo Port and Hong Kong Port.

Port News

Evaluating efficiency of top global container ports

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The New York Shipping Exchange’s plan to introduce indexes to support long-term contracts adds to an already crowded field of providers. </div>

The New York Shipping Exchange’s plan to introduce indexes to support long-term contracts adds to an already crowded field of providers.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">The New York Shipping Exchange (NYSHEX) on Tuesday said it will launch a series of free ocean freight rate indexes in 2025 designed to underpin index-linked contracts. The indexes will be developed in conjunction with the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which has also invested in NYSHEX as part of a new tranche of funding it received Tuesday from a range of investors. The new indexes are “based on actual cargo moving rates, which will be transparently governed by industry representatives, and will be freely available for all carriers, shippers and [non-vessel-operating common carriers] to use for their index-linked contracts,” NYSHEX CEO Gordon Downes said in a statement. The introduction of NYSHEX’s indexes adds depth to an already crowded field of container freight rate index providers. Xeneta, Freightos, Drewry, the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index and Platts, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&amp;P Global, all currently provide ocean freight indexes, with various methodologies. “The container shipping industry is vital for global trade, yet it remains an inefficient and volatile market,” Stuart Williams, chief operating officer of ICE, said in the statement. “We recently launched ICE Digital Trade (IDT) to support the global shipping industry, and our partnership with NYSHEX is a further step in that direction.” Pandemic-era constraints on ocean freight capacity led shippers to tie up index-linked, multi-year contracts with ocean carriers at higher-than-historical rates, but the use of those contracts tapered off as rates declined and capacity opened up over the last few years. Still, advocates of index-linked contracts say it is the only mechanism to alleviate the volatility that can define the ocean freight market. Long-term contracts allow shippers to operate with transportation cost certainty, while allowing vessel operators to plan their capacity networks more effectively. NYSHEX didn’t specify how the indexes will be deployed, in terms of trade lanes or port pairs. Most existing indexes focus on spot rates and tend to delineate by region or trade lane. NYSHEX was founded in 2014 to build a technology-backed mechanism for shippers, NVOs and shipping lines to construct ocean freight contracts that were mutually binding. Container lines Mediterranean Shipping Co., Maersk, CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd are users of the platform. Meanwhile, the new funding round, the size of which was not disclosed, also saw participation from NYSHEX’s existing investors Goldman Sachs Alternatives, NewRoad Capital and Blumberg Capital. Contact Eric Johnson at eric.johnson@spglobal.com. </div>

The New York Shipping Exchange (NYSHEX) on Tuesday said it will launch a series of free ocean freight rate indexes in 2025 designed to underpin index-linked contracts. The indexes will be developed in conjunction with the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which has also invested in NYSHEX as part of a new tranche of funding it received Tuesday from a range of investors. The new indexes are “based on actual cargo moving rates, which will be transparently governed by industry representatives, and will be freely available for all carriers, shippers and [non-vessel-operating common carriers] to use for their index-linked contracts,” NYSHEX CEO Gordon Downes said in a statement. The introduction of NYSHEX’s indexes adds depth to an already crowded field of container freight rate index providers. Xeneta, Freightos, Drewry, the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index and Platts, a sister company of the Journal of Commerce within S&P Global, all currently provide ocean freight indexes, with various methodologies. “The container shipping industry is vital for global trade, yet it remains an inefficient and volatile market,” Stuart Williams, chief operating officer of ICE, said in the statement. “We recently launched ICE Digital Trade (IDT) to support the global shipping industry, and our partnership with NYSHEX is a further step in that direction.” Pandemic-era constraints on ocean freight capacity led shippers to tie up index-linked, multi-year contracts with ocean carriers at higher-than-historical rates, but the use of those contracts tapered off as rates declined and capacity opened up over the last few years. Still, advocates of index-linked contracts say it is the only mechanism to alleviate the volatility that can define the ocean freight market. Long-term contracts allow shippers to operate with transportation cost certainty, while allowing vessel operators to plan their capacity networks more effectively. NYSHEX didn’t specify how the indexes will be deployed, in terms of trade lanes or port pairs. Most existing indexes focus on spot rates and tend to delineate by region or trade lane. NYSHEX was founded in 2014 to build a technology-backed mechanism for shippers, NVOs and shipping lines to construct ocean freight contracts that were mutually binding. Container lines Mediterranean Shipping Co., Maersk, CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd are users of the platform. Meanwhile, the new funding round, the size of which was not disclosed, also saw participation from NYSHEX’s existing investors Goldman Sachs Alternatives, NewRoad Capital and Blumberg Capital. Contact Eric Johnson at eric.johnson@spglobal.com.

Logistics Technology News

Container lines

Trans-Atlantic

Forwarding

Asia-Europe

Trans-Pacific

Container Shipping News

NYSHEX says will launch ocean freight rate indexes next year

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The urgent creation of new e-fuel markets for the most scalable net-zero solutions is essential if global cargo owners are to achieve their 2030 and 2040 climate goals, according to ZEMBA.</div>

The urgent creation of new e-fuel markets for the most scalable net-zero solutions is essential if global cargo owners are to achieve their 2030 and 2040 climate goals, according to ZEMBA.

<div class="phx-topic">A group of 40 global shippers has pushed the decarbonization boat further out with its second tender to ocean carriers focusing exclusively on cargo transported on e-fuel-powered container ships from 2027. The call made by the Zero Emission Maritime Buyers Alliance (ZEMBA) for offers from carriers will be launched in January, with ZEMBA increasing its ambition to fast-track the commercial deployment of green shipping services at scale to create a competitive market for those services. Ingrid Irigoyen, president and CEO of ZEMBA, said the alliance of shippers were voluntarily catalyzing commercial e-fuel deployment through the next collective tender. E-fuels are synthetic fuels produced using renewable electricity and include e-methanol and biomethane, a cleaner version of liquefied natural gas (LNG). “Our members are demonstrating that freight buyers are willing to make multi-year advanced offtake commitments now to incentivize the creation of new markets for the most scalable solutions, which will be required for them to achieve their 2030 and 2040 climate goals,” Irigoyen said in a statement announcing the tender. “By creating economies of scale and targeting investment in the right long-term solutions, our members can also accelerate the pace and manage overall costs of this clean energy transition,” she added. <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/hapag-lloyd-wins-asia-europe-green-shipping-tender-to-launch-next-year-5240949">Hapag-Lloyd in April was awarded ZEMBA’s inaugural tender</a> for the zero-emission shipment of containers from Singapore to Rotterdam that will cover 1.2 billion TEU-miles over a two-year period beginning in 2025. Through the latest tender, ZEMBA is aiming to compile a minimum of 80 billion tonne nautical miles of demand for emissions reductions linked to container shipping powered by e-fuels starting in 2027. That would equate to 1.4 million 20-foot containers transported across the Pacific Ocean by e-fuels, assuming a benchmark distance of Shanghai to Los Angeles. <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="1a054077-7728-4ffd-abb8-b7aff17c3235"></dynamic-object></div>ZEMBA’s e-fuel focus for the upcoming tender builds off experience gained during the inaugural tender that introduced a new very-low emission fuel alternative to freight buyers in the maritime sector – liquified biomethane from waste. The group is seeking three- to five-year contracts for e-fuel-powered container shipping starting in 2027, e-fuel bids that achieve at least 90% emission reduction for primary propulsion, and bids from individual ocean carriers or consortiums, with ZEMBA being open to the possibility of multiple winners. <h3>Report card slams retail decarbonization efforts </h3>But with the ink not yet dry on the ZEMBA statement, climate and public health coalition Ship It Zero released a damning 2024 report card Tuesday grading more than two dozen retailers and ocean carriers on their efforts to decarbonize and develop zero-emission fuels for maritime shipping. The report will make for uncomfortable reading for some of the world’s largest retailers, with Amazon, one of ZEMBA’s founding members, labeled as the “prime polluter.” Ship It Zero data from 2019 to 2023 shows Amazon’s maritime emissions increased 26% over the five years, its US air freight pollution was up 67%, delivery van carbon dioxide emissions grew over 190% and its heavy-duty truck emissions rose 51%. “IKEA, LG, Samsung, Home Depot and Amazon wield tremendous power and influence to shape the future of zero-emission shipping, but a year after our last report card, most retailers, with the exception of IKEA, are failing,” said Ship It Zero campaign manager Jonathan Butler. “We need these companies to clean up their shipping act and commit to 100% zero-emission ocean shipping by 2030, and we call on IKEA to lead its industry peers towards a zero-emission future,” he added. The Ship It Zero report noted that Home Depot has not joined the Cargo Owners for Zero Emission Shipping (coZEV) initiative or ZEMBA, two organizations designed to bring companies together to innovate and invest in solutions for the reduction of maritime shipping emissions. “Home Depot’s absence from these initiatives demonstrates a concerning lack of commitment to investing in zero-emission maritime shipping solutions and to mobilizing its industry peers to raise climate ambitions,” said Ship It Zero. Other retailers categorized as being “at risk of failure” in their decarbonization efforts were LG and Samsung. Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

A group of 40 global shippers has pushed the decarbonization boat further out with its second tender to ocean carriers focusing exclusively on cargo transported on e-fuel-powered container ships from 2027. The call made by the Zero Emission Maritime Buyers Alliance (ZEMBA) for offers from carriers will be launched in January, with ZEMBA increasing its ambition to fast-track the commercial deployment of green shipping services at scale to create a competitive market for those services. Ingrid Irigoyen, president and CEO of ZEMBA, said the alliance of shippers were voluntarily catalyzing commercial e-fuel deployment through the next collective tender. E-fuels are synthetic fuels produced using renewable electricity and include e-methanol and biomethane, a cleaner version of liquefied natural gas (LNG). “Our members are demonstrating that freight buyers are willing to make multi-year advanced offtake commitments now to incentivize the creation of new markets for the most scalable solutions, which will be required for them to achieve their 2030 and 2040 climate goals,” Irigoyen said in a statement announcing the tender. “By creating economies of scale and targeting investment in the right long-term solutions, our members can also accelerate the pace and manage overall costs of this clean energy transition,” she added. Hapag-Lloyd in April was awarded ZEMBA’s inaugural tender for the zero-emission shipment of containers from Singapore to Rotterdam that will cover 1.2 billion TEU-miles over a two-year period beginning in 2025. Through the latest tender, ZEMBA is aiming to compile a minimum of 80 billion tonne nautical miles of demand for emissions reductions linked to container shipping powered by e-fuels starting in 2027. That would equate to 1.4 million 20-foot containers transported across the Pacific Ocean by e-fuels, assuming a benchmark distance of Shanghai to Los Angeles. ZEMBA’s e-fuel focus for the upcoming tender builds off experience gained during the inaugural tender that introduced a new very-low emission fuel alternative to freight buyers in the maritime sector – liquified biomethane from waste. The group is seeking three- to five-year contracts for e-fuel-powered container shipping starting in 2027, e-fuel bids that achieve at least 90% emission reduction for primary propulsion, and bids from individual ocean carriers or consortiums, with ZEMBA being open to the possibility of multiple winners. Report card slams retail decarbonization efforts But with the ink not yet dry on the ZEMBA statement, climate and public health coalition Ship It Zero released a damning 2024 report card Tuesday grading more than two dozen retailers and ocean carriers on their efforts to decarbonize and develop zero-emission fuels for maritime shipping. The report will make for uncomfortable reading for some of the world’s largest retailers, with Amazon, one of ZEMBA’s founding members, labeled as the “prime polluter.” Ship It Zero data from 2019 to 2023 shows Amazon’s maritime emissions increased 26% over the five years, its US air freight pollution was up 67%, delivery van carbon dioxide emissions grew over 190% and its heavy-duty truck emissions rose 51%. “IKEA, LG, Samsung, Home Depot and Amazon wield tremendous power and influence to shape the future of zero-emission shipping, but a year after our last report card, most retailers, with the exception of IKEA, are failing,” said Ship It Zero campaign manager Jonathan Butler. “We need these companies to clean up their shipping act and commit to 100% zero-emission ocean shipping by 2030, and we call on IKEA to lead its industry peers towards a zero-emission future,” he added. The Ship It Zero report noted that Home Depot has not joined the Cargo Owners for Zero Emission Shipping (coZEV) initiative or ZEMBA, two organizations designed to bring companies together to innovate and invest in solutions for the reduction of maritime shipping emissions. “Home Depot’s absence from these initiatives demonstrates a concerning lack of commitment to investing in zero-emission maritime shipping solutions and to mobilizing its industry peers to raise climate ambitions,” said Ship It Zero. Other retailers categorized as being “at risk of failure” in their decarbonization efforts were LG and Samsung. Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com .

Maritime

Global shippers’ alliance to launch pioneering e-fuel ocean tender

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">A lack of action at the government level is now the number one bottleneck facing green corridor projects, according to a new report.</div>

A lack of action at the government level is now the number one bottleneck facing green corridor projects, according to a new report.

<div class="phx-topic">Green ocean corridors crucial to decarbonizing container shipping have grown rapidly over the past year, but the continued development of these trade routes is facing a “feasibility wall” in the absence of national policy incentives to narrow the cost gap between fossil fuels and cleaner alternatives, according to a new report. The Annual Progress Report on Green Shipping Corridors 2024, published Tuesday by the Getting to Zero Coalition and the Global Maritime Forum, said this lack of action at the government level was now the number one bottleneck facing green corridor projects. “Green shipping corridors have an essential role to play in accelerating zero-emission shipping,” Jesse Fahnestock, director of decarbonization at the Global Maritime Forum, said in a statement. “This year saw a handful of advanced corridors setting the pace, but continued progress is not inevitable.” The warning comes as shipping’s greenhouse gas emissions return to the peak levels seen in 2008. Longer voyages around southern Africa to avoid ongoing hostilities in the Red Sea, spiralling freight rates and congestion across ocean container supply chains led to record-high carbon emissions in the third quarter, according to rate benchmarking platform Xeneta. The Marine Benchmark Carbon Emissions Index (CEI), which measures carbon emissions across Xeneta’s top 13 ocean container shipping trades, hit 107.9 points in the third quarter — the highest on record and up 12.2% compared with a year ago before the Red Sea crisis. The Global Maritime Forum report said 18 new green shipping corridor initiatives emerged worldwide in 2024, a 40% increase over 2023, with a third of the existing initiatives making “significant, measurable progress” in the past year. <h3>Africa diversions frustrate emissions cuts </h3>One of the largest of those green corridor projects connects the hubs of Rotterdam and Singapore, and even though the forced diversions around Africa are frustrating the drive to reduce shipping emissions, work continues on cleaning up the Asia-Europe trade route. The <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/singapore-rotterdam-ports-commit-to-green-corridor-deal-5242711">Rotterdam-Singapore Green and Digital Shipping Corridor</a> aims to reduce emissions from large container vessels on the 15,000-km route by at least 20% by 2030 by enabling the use of low- and zero-carbon shipping fuels. It is a project with 25 partners operating more than 90 large container vessels on the route with a combined transport capacity of 1.5 million TEUs per year. However, a recent Port of Rotterdam report said without urgent government initiatives to address the wide price gap between fossil fuels and low- or zero-emission fuels, there would not be the level of commitment needed from carriers and fuel producers, slowing the development of the green corridors. “Sustainable fuels are estimated to be two to three times more expensive than fossil fuels and could account for a significant portion of the total cost of ownership for container vessels,” the report noted. “This makes it difficult for shipping companies to commit to long-term offtake agreements, thereby hampering investments from suppliers in new production facilities,” it added. Maersk recently estimated that even with current regulatory tools in place such as the <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/european-parliament-approves-shipping-ets-but-stakeholders-wary-5202492">European Union’s Emissions Trading System (ETS)</a> and <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/container-carriers-to-shoulder-bulk-of-europe-fuel-intensity-rule-5192246">FuelEU Maritime fuel intensity rules</a> that will be applied from Jan. 1, only by the mid-2030s would it be more expensive to use fossil fuels on ships rather than green fuels. <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="321b8a55-a7c4-47b5-91e8-82ca9eb8c88a"></dynamic-object></div>Member states of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) are working on <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/midterm-emissions-plan-to-take-center-stage-at-upcoming-imo-meeting-5731399">reaching an agreement on the proposed midterm measures</a> involving a carbon pricing mechanism and the establishment of a fuel standard that must be approved at the MEPC 83 meeting in April 2025 if they are to be adopted in October next year. <h3>Green trade lanes central to decarbonization </h3>The concept of green corridors was established in November 2021 as a critical way to scale new sustainable fuels and technologies. They are regarded as being central to delivering the goal of having zero-emission fuels account for 5% of all fuels by 2030, a target considered to be the threshold at which the infrastructure, supply chains, and technologies that support zero-emission fuels are mature enough to enable exponential growth. Fahnestock said if industry and national governments made a concerted effort to share the costs and risks associated with new fuels, “these leading corridors could together generate a breakthrough for zero-emission shipping before 2030.” But if green corridors fail to continue advancing, the report said the 5% target that could potentially jeopardize the industry’s entire 2050 net-zero goal will be at risk. “With shipping providing the backbone for global trade, failing to meet the sector’s decarbonization targets could have significant implications for Scope 3 emissions reductions across all sectors,” the report noted. The report identified key recommendations for the continued development of green corridors. On top of increased government support to bridge the operational cost gap of transitioning to alternative energy sources, the report said innovative commercial agreements for procurement within green corridor initiatives could be developed. Also recommended was more focused support on existing green corridor initiatives, a flexible governance approach to allow for risk sharing and scaling, as well as policy and finance to promote green corridors in the southern hemisphere’s weaker economies. Contact Greg Knowler at <a href="mailto:greg.knowler@spglobal.com">greg.knowler@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

Green ocean corridors crucial to decarbonizing container shipping have grown rapidly over the past year, but the continued development of these trade routes is facing a “feasibility wall” in the absence of national policy incentives to narrow the cost gap between fossil fuels and cleaner alternatives, according to a new report. The Annual Progress Report on Green Shipping Corridors 2024, published Tuesday by the Getting to Zero Coalition and the Global Maritime Forum, said this lack of action at the government level was now the number one bottleneck facing green corridor projects. “Green shipping corridors have an essential role to play in accelerating zero-emission shipping,” Jesse Fahnestock, director of decarbonization at the Global Maritime Forum, said in a statement. “This year saw a handful of advanced corridors setting the pace, but continued progress is not inevitable.” The warning comes as shipping’s greenhouse gas emissions return to the peak levels seen in 2008. Longer voyages around southern Africa to avoid ongoing hostilities in the Red Sea, spiralling freight rates and congestion across ocean container supply chains led to record-high carbon emissions in the third quarter, according to rate benchmarking platform Xeneta. The Marine Benchmark Carbon Emissions Index (CEI), which measures carbon emissions across Xeneta’s top 13 ocean container shipping trades, hit 107.9 points in the third quarter — the highest on record and up 12.2% compared with a year ago before the Red Sea crisis. The Global Maritime Forum report said 18 new green shipping corridor initiatives emerged worldwide in 2024, a 40% increase over 2023, with a third of the existing initiatives making “significant, measurable progress” in the past year. Africa diversions frustrate emissions cuts One of the largest of those green corridor projects connects the hubs of Rotterdam and Singapore, and even though the forced diversions around Africa are frustrating the drive to reduce shipping emissions, work continues on cleaning up the Asia-Europe trade route. The Rotterdam-Singapore Green and Digital Shipping Corridor aims to reduce emissions from large container vessels on the 15,000-km route by at least 20% by 2030 by enabling the use of low- and zero-carbon shipping fuels. It is a project with 25 partners operating more than 90 large container vessels on the route with a combined transport capacity of 1.5 million TEUs per year. However, a recent Port of Rotterdam report said without urgent government initiatives to address the wide price gap between fossil fuels and low- or zero-emission fuels, there would not be the level of commitment needed from carriers and fuel producers, slowing the development of the green corridors. “Sustainable fuels are estimated to be two to three times more expensive than fossil fuels and could account for a significant portion of the total cost of ownership for container vessels,” the report noted. “This makes it difficult for shipping companies to commit to long-term offtake agreements, thereby hampering investments from suppliers in new production facilities,” it added. Maersk recently estimated that even with current regulatory tools in place such as the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) and FuelEU Maritime fuel intensity rules that will be applied from Jan. 1, only by the mid-2030s would it be more expensive to use fossil fuels on ships rather than green fuels. Member states of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) are working on reaching an agreement on the proposed midterm measures involving a carbon pricing mechanism and the establishment of a fuel standard that must be approved at the MEPC 83 meeting in April 2025 if they are to be adopted in October next year. Green trade lanes central to decarbonization The concept of green corridors was established in November 2021 as a critical way to scale new sustainable fuels and technologies. They are regarded as being central to delivering the goal of having zero-emission fuels account for 5% of all fuels by 2030, a target considered to be the threshold at which the infrastructure, supply chains, and technologies that support zero-emission fuels are mature enough to enable exponential growth. Fahnestock said if industry and national governments made a concerted effort to share the costs and risks associated with new fuels, “these leading corridors could together generate a breakthrough for zero-emission shipping before 2030.” But if green corridors fail to continue advancing, the report said the 5% target that could potentially jeopardize the industry’s entire 2050 net-zero goal will be at risk. “With shipping providing the backbone for global trade, failing to meet the sector’s decarbonization targets could have significant implications for Scope 3 emissions reductions across all sectors,” the report noted. The report identified key recommendations for the continued development of green corridors. On top of increased government support to bridge the operational cost gap of transitioning to alternative energy sources, the report said innovative commercial agreements for procurement within green corridor initiatives could be developed. Also recommended was more focused support on existing green corridor initiatives, a flexible governance approach to allow for risk sharing and scaling, as well as policy and finance to promote green corridors in the southern hemisphere’s weaker economies. Contact Greg Knowler at greg.knowler@spglobal.com .

International ports

Green ocean corridors hitting ‘feasibility wall’: Global Maritime Forum

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The Ships for America Act and national security spotlight seen as growth opportunities for US-flag commercial fleet.</div>

The Ships for America Act and national security spotlight seen as growth opportunities for US-flag commercial fleet.

<div class="phx-topic">Support from the US government and an increased focus on national security are positioning the US-flag fleet for significant expansion and investment in the coming years, a panel of US-flag shipowners, operators, brokers and investors told attendees at the Marine Money conference in New Orleans last week.Panelists cited plans for the bipartisan “Ships for America Act” — sponsored by US senators Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and Mike Waltz (R-Fla.) in a bid to boost US shipbuilding and expand the US-flag fleet — as a key growth opportunity. “It’s getting a lot of support from Congress. We’re getting a ton of support from the miliary — stuff we haven’t seen in a very long time. It’s generational,” said Ryan Libhart Pereyda, principal and CEO of Patriot Maritime, a California-based federal contractor that owns and operates US flag ships, including large roll-on/roll-off (ro/ro) vessels and tankers.Pereyda pointed out that US President-elect Donald Trump nominated Waltz to be his national security adviser, while Trump tapped one of the bill’s other signatories, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), for Secretary of State.The bill’s authors have stated that whereas the US had 10,000 US-flagged ships at the end of World War II, that number is now closer to about 80. Pereyda said the bill seeks to double the current number. “Is that realistic? Probably not. But having that sort of political support over the next four years and with all the support we’ve seen from Congress in the last few years for the Tanker Security Program, we think it’s a good opportunity,” he said. <h3>Incentivized vessels at capacity</h3>Panelists said the need for military readiness has helped drive investor interest in building US flag ships through two federal programs — the Maritime Security Program (MSP) and Tanker Security Program (TSP). Both programs provide federal stipends to maintain US-flagged vessels that could be used to move military vehicles, equipment and fuel tankers.“The big threat of not having enough US flag ships for national security purposes is a real concern. So hopefully in the next administration and the next Congress, they can increase funding for these programs to allow more ships to come in,” said Obaid Ahmad, president of Washington, DC-based ship brokerage firm Euro-American Shipping &amp; Trade.The Maritime Security Program (MSP), which was created in 1996, maintains a 60-vessel fleet of military-capable US-flag commercial vessels of various types, including breakbulk, ro/ro, container and multipurpose vessels (MPVs). Hugh Eden II, managing director in the global maritime division of investment firm Jefferies LLC, said he sees significant investment potential in expanding the MSP’s sister program, which was established in 2021 to maintain a fleet of 10 US-registered commercial vessels capable of supplying fuel to the armed forces. As of 2023, both programs were fully enrolled with the maximum number of vessels. “I think it represents a new lever for potential growth in putting to work either capital or ships on hold that they can put to work in the market,” Eden said.Will Terrell, president of US-flag MPV operator US Ocean of Houston, said fortifying the fleet will also rely on stricter enforcement of US cargo preference laws, which require the use of US-flag vessels to move any cargo that is owned, obtained, supplied or paid for by the US government. “At the end of the day, we’re all in the cargo business,” he said. “You can’t just crank up the number of ships and not do something on the cargo side as well.”Contact Autumn Cafiero Giusti at <a href="mailto:autumn@autumngiusti.com">autumn@autumngiusti.com</a>.</div>

Support from the US government and an increased focus on national security are positioning the US-flag fleet for significant expansion and investment in the coming years, a panel of US-flag shipowners, operators, brokers and investors told attendees at the Marine Money conference in New Orleans last week. Panelists cited plans for the bipartisan “Ships for America Act” — sponsored by US senators Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and Mike Waltz (R-Fla.) in a bid to boost US shipbuilding and expand the US-flag fleet — as a key growth opportunity. “It’s getting a lot of support from Congress. We’re getting a ton of support from the miliary — stuff we haven’t seen in a very long time. It’s generational,” said Ryan Libhart Pereyda, principal and CEO of Patriot Maritime, a California-based federal contractor that owns and operates US flag ships, including large roll-on/roll-off (ro/ro) vessels and tankers. Pereyda pointed out that US President-elect Donald Trump nominated Waltz to be his national security adviser, while Trump tapped one of the bill’s other signatories, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), for Secretary of State. The bill’s authors have stated that whereas the US had 10,000 US-flagged ships at the end of World War II, that number is now closer to about 80. Pereyda said the bill seeks to double the current number. “Is that realistic? Probably not. But having that sort of political support over the next four years and with all the support we’ve seen from Congress in the last few years for the Tanker Security Program, we think it’s a good opportunity,” he said. Incentivized vessels at capacity Panelists said the need for military readiness has helped drive investor interest in building US flag ships through two federal programs — the Maritime Security Program (MSP) and Tanker Security Program (TSP). Both programs provide federal stipends to maintain US-flagged vessels that could be used to move military vehicles, equipment and fuel tankers. “The big threat of not having enough US flag ships for national security purposes is a real concern. So hopefully in the next administration and the next Congress, they can increase funding for these programs to allow more ships to come in,” said Obaid Ahmad, president of Washington, DC-based ship brokerage firm Euro-American Shipping & Trade. The Maritime Security Program (MSP), which was created in 1996, maintains a 60-vessel fleet of military-capable US-flag commercial vessels of various types, including breakbulk, ro/ro, container and multipurpose vessels (MPVs). Hugh Eden II, managing director in the global maritime division of investment firm Jefferies LLC, said he sees significant investment potential in expanding the MSP’s sister program, which was established in 2021 to maintain a fleet of 10 US-registered commercial vessels capable of supplying fuel to the armed forces. As of 2023, both programs were fully enrolled with the maximum number of vessels. “I think it represents a new lever for potential growth in putting to work either capital or ships on hold that they can put to work in the market,” Eden said. Will Terrell, president of US-flag MPV operator US Ocean of Houston, said fortifying the fleet will also rely on stricter enforcement of US cargo preference laws, which require the use of US-flag vessels to move any cargo that is owned, obtained, supplied or paid for by the US government. “At the end of the day, we’re all in the cargo business,” he said. “You can’t just crank up the number of ships and not do something on the cargo side as well.” Contact Autumn Cafiero Giusti at autumn@autumngiusti.com .

Breakbulk carriers

Ro/ro cargo

Project cargo

Breakbulk News

US flag vessel owners, investors tout wave of support for expanding fleet

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Forwarders and industry analysts forecast strong import volumes through the early Lunar New Year that begins Jan. 29 as importers of time-sensitive merchandise and manufacturing components route shipments through the country’s busiest gateway.</div>

Forwarders and industry analysts forecast strong import volumes through the early Lunar New Year that begins Jan. 29 as importers of time-sensitive merchandise and manufacturing components route shipments through the country’s busiest gateway.

<div class="phx-topic">Rail container dwell times at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach rose to their highest level in two years last month and will likely remain elevated through January amid higher-than-normal import volumes driven in part by cargo diversions from the US East and Gulf coasts. Rail-destined container dwell times in the largest US port complex increased to an average of 9.86 days in October, up from 9.25 days in September and 8.2 days in August, according to data from the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA), which represents terminal operators and shipping lines on the West Coast. “I think dwell times will remain elongated until the rails get some relief on the volumes,” said Lawrence Gross, president and founder of Gross Transportation and a Journal of Commerce analyst. US imports from Asia moving through Los Angeles-Long Beach have been exceptionally strong since the earlier-than-usual peak season began in early summer. Asian imports in the gateway were up 30% in July through September compared with the same period last year, according to PIERS, a Journal of Commerce sister product within S&amp;P Global. “The continued upward trajectory in dwell times through October underscores both the complexity and adaptability of our supply chain as we manage increased cargo volumes and try to balance intermodal equipment availability with demand,” said Natasha Villa, external affairs manager for the PMSA. <div class="wrapper-narrow"><dynamic-object type="jocchartid" resource-id="155dedc1-99f2-4adf-a449-1c9ab2510f95"></dynamic-object></div>Forwarders and industry analysts forecast strong import volumes through the early Lunar New Year that begins Jan. 29 as importers of time-sensitive merchandise and manufacturing components route shipments through Los Angeles-Long Beach. Importers are <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/ila-breaks-off-contract-talks-accuses-usmx-of-semi-automation-push-5810392">concerned about the possibility of another strike by the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA)</a> when its extended contract expires on Jan. 15. Importers are also front-loading shipments in anticipation <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/hapag-lloyd-sees-possible-pre-lny-cargo-rush-amid-very-healthy-demand-5817691">of a large increase in tariffs under the new Trump administration</a>.<h3>Terminals, railroads say rail dwells have peaked </h3>Railroad and terminal operator sources, meanwhile, told the Journal of Commerce that while import volumes will remain higher than normal through January, imports through Southern California peaked last month. Terminal operators are now focusing on relieving the backlog of rail containers that built up in recent months. “It definitely plateaued in October and we’re chipping away at the backlog,” said Alan McCorkle, president of Yusen Terminals in Los Angeles. Rail container dwell times at Long Beach Container Terminal (LBCT) last week were down to about three days, said Anthony Otto, LBCT’s president. “We’re all caught up and things are headed in the right direction,” Otto said. Union Pacific Railroad said the past month has seen significant improvement in Southern California. “So much has changed since October. Today (Nov. 14), Union Pacific’s total LA-LB inventory count is down to its lowest level since mid-July 2024,” a UP spokesperson told the Journal of Commerce. “We have also made significant progress in working with individual port terminals to significantly reduce aged containers.” UP this year has experienced a higher jump in loaded railcars idling. Between January and August, the railroad averaged 68 loaded intermodal railcars idling per week, according to the US Surface Transportation Board (STB). The average grew to 139 in September and 199 in October, although it peaked at 241 in the second week of October. BNSF Railway averaged 221 railcars idling in January through August, 170 in September, and 237 in October, with the peak in the third week of October, according to the STB data. <h3>Shippers still experiencing delays </h3>The upbeat analysis of the terminals and railroads is of little solace to shippers who say they still struggle with delays at the marine terminals. An importer in the automotive sector said he has no recourse but to build a buffer for rail container dwell times into his Southern California supply chain. “We have been doing this for months,” said the importer, who did not want to be identified. “Big guys move quicker, the rest of us slower.” Steve Hughes, president and CEO of the consultancy HCS International, said Southern California is an important gateway for automotive industry imports due to its extensive intermodal rail connections to the eastern half of the US. For many importers, rerouting shipments to other ports is not an option. “If you’re looking for good rail connections, there are not many viable alternatives,” Hughes said, noting that other West Coast gateways such as Seattle-Tacoma and Vancouver are also experiencing rail container dwell issues. Mario Cordero, executive director of the Port of Long Beach, said he feels “very comfortable” about the ability of terminal operators in the port complex to handle the continued high import volumes projected through the Lunar New Year. Cordero noted that Long Beach in October had its busiest month ever in terms of total cargo volume. With Los Angeles this week scheduled to report a strong October, Cordero said the port complex is handling the record volumes without the backlog of 109 container ships it experienced in January 2022. “We [Long Beach] are at 70% of capacity,” he said. “We’re already receiving cargo diverted from the East Coast. If there’s a bump in cargo, we’ll handle it.” Contact Bill Mongelluzzo at <a href="mailto:bill.mongelluzzo@spglobal.com">bill.mongelluzzo@spglobal.com</a>.Ari Ashe, Senior Editor, contributed to this story </div>

Rail container dwell times at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach rose to their highest level in two years last month and will likely remain elevated through January amid higher-than-normal import volumes driven in part by cargo diversions from the US East and Gulf coasts. Rail-destined container dwell times in the largest US port complex increased to an average of 9.86 days in October, up from 9.25 days in September and 8.2 days in August, according to data from the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA), which represents terminal operators and shipping lines on the West Coast. “I think dwell times will remain elongated until the rails get some relief on the volumes,” said Lawrence Gross, president and founder of Gross Transportation and a Journal of Commerce analyst. US imports from Asia moving through Los Angeles-Long Beach have been exceptionally strong since the earlier-than-usual peak season began in early summer. Asian imports in the gateway were up 30% in July through September compared with the same period last year, according to PIERS, a Journal of Commerce sister product within S&P Global. “The continued upward trajectory in dwell times through October underscores both the complexity and adaptability of our supply chain as we manage increased cargo volumes and try to balance intermodal equipment availability with demand,” said Natasha Villa, external affairs manager for the PMSA. Forwarders and industry analysts forecast strong import volumes through the early Lunar New Year that begins Jan. 29 as importers of time-sensitive merchandise and manufacturing components route shipments through Los Angeles-Long Beach. Importers are concerned about the possibility of another strike by the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) when its extended contract expires on Jan. 15. Importers are also front-loading shipments in anticipation of a large increase in tariffs under the new Trump administration . Terminals, railroads say rail dwells have peaked Railroad and terminal operator sources, meanwhile, told the Journal of Commerce that while import volumes will remain higher than normal through January, imports through Southern California peaked last month. Terminal operators are now focusing on relieving the backlog of rail containers that built up in recent months. “It definitely plateaued in October and we’re chipping away at the backlog,” said Alan McCorkle, president of Yusen Terminals in Los Angeles. Rail container dwell times at Long Beach Container Terminal (LBCT) last week were down to about three days, said Anthony Otto, LBCT’s president. “We’re all caught up and things are headed in the right direction,” Otto said. Union Pacific Railroad said the past month has seen significant improvement in Southern California. “So much has changed since October. Today (Nov. 14), Union Pacific’s total LA-LB inventory count is down to its lowest level since mid-July 2024,” a UP spokesperson told the Journal of Commerce. “We have also made significant progress in working with individual port terminals to significantly reduce aged containers.” UP this year has experienced a higher jump in loaded railcars idling. Between January and August, the railroad averaged 68 loaded intermodal railcars idling per week, according to the US Surface Transportation Board (STB). The average grew to 139 in September and 199 in October, although it peaked at 241 in the second week of October. BNSF Railway averaged 221 railcars idling in January through August, 170 in September, and 237 in October, with the peak in the third week of October, according to the STB data. Shippers still experiencing delays The upbeat analysis of the terminals and railroads is of little solace to shippers who say they still struggle with delays at the marine terminals. An importer in the automotive sector said he has no recourse but to build a buffer for rail container dwell times into his Southern California supply chain. “We have been doing this for months,” said the importer, who did not want to be identified. “Big guys move quicker, the rest of us slower.” Steve Hughes, president and CEO of the consultancy HCS International, said Southern California is an important gateway for automotive industry imports due to its extensive intermodal rail connections to the eastern half of the US. For many importers, rerouting shipments to other ports is not an option. “If you’re looking for good rail connections, there are not many viable alternatives,” Hughes said, noting that other West Coast gateways such as Seattle-Tacoma and Vancouver are also experiencing rail container dwell issues. Mario Cordero, executive director of the Port of Long Beach, said he feels “very comfortable” about the ability of terminal operators in the port complex to handle the continued high import volumes projected through the Lunar New Year. Cordero noted that Long Beach in October had its busiest month ever in terms of total cargo volume. With Los Angeles this week scheduled to report a strong October, Cordero said the port complex is handling the record volumes without the backlog of 109 container ships it experienced in January 2022. “We [Long Beach] are at 70% of capacity,” he said. “We’re already receiving cargo diverted from the East Coast. If there’s a bump in cargo, we’ll handle it.” Contact Bill Mongelluzzo at bill.mongelluzzo@spglobal.com .Ari Ashe, Senior Editor, contributed to this story

North American ports

Marine terminals

Importers navigate two-year high rail container dwells in Los Angeles-Long Beach

Subscribe today and save 20%
Use code STSW20 at checkout
Valid for first year of subscription

Subscribe Now - Free Trials - Wide Box

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE

Subscribe Now - Anonymous - Wide Box

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days.

Free Trial - Wide Box

START A FREE TRIAL TODAY

Upgrade to Gold today for just $795
Use code GUW695 at checkout
Valid for first year of subscription

Upgrade Subscription - Wide Box

UPGRADE TODAY AND SAVE

Register today to redeem your Gold subscriber discount!

TPM Discount - Gold

Save 20% on TPM25

The world of LTL is slow to embrace change. Business anachronisms permeate current supply chain processes. These vestiges of the way things used to work define the LTL freight transportation procurement process of many modern shippers.David Knuth, logistics specialist at IEWC, a global supplier of cable and wire based in Wisconsin, is happy to have modernized the RFP process, automating the entire LTL bidding procedure with Bid$ense, SMC³’s automated truckload and LTL freight transportation sourcing solution. But when prompted, he can still recall what once was.In his previous job, a large part of his duties were consumed by creating an intermodal bid package for carriers. In a spreadsheet, Knuth detailed the company’s volumes lane by lane, taking care to delete any errant keystrokes or misleading data. He would then email out the information to each carrier, taking time to respond to detailed technical questions about the spreadsheet data. Finally, he had to compile all the results, create an algorithm that would compare the carriers on each lane, and award the business.“It was a huge undertaking. It took about four months to do,” Knuth said of the old process. “It was almost a full-time job for that part of the year, every year.”In his new job at IEWC, he sat down with Bid$ense on day one and was amazed at the capabilities. Knuth had never before used a bid tool. SMC³’s latest versions of Bid$ense automate the process even further, taking truckload and LTL RFPs entirely online. The tool draws on RFP best-practices protocols to streamline the bidding communication process, enabling bidding carriers to respond accurately and promptly to shipper requests. The solution also does all the distribution work automatically, electronically submitting shipper bid data to carriers based on their actual service capabilities and performance records. Carriers are alerted with timely prompts for RFP deliverables, so shippers aren’t waiting by the phone for responses.Another benefit of automating the process is the data-cleansing assistance. When Knuth sent spreadsheets to carriers, data errors might cloud the bidding process; he might have to resend data or simply accept a price that did not truly reflect the costs of doing business. Data cleansing is incredibly beneficial, he said.The spreadsheet technique also made bidding analysis an onerous task. Since Bid$ense automates and streamlines the entire RFP process, intensive examination is now simple. SMC³ knows that each bid has more than one best outcome. With uniform responses from each carrier, shippers can quickly rank results and create an unlimited quantity of what-if scenarios to make the optimal procurement decision.Jesse Burnett of Central Garden &amp; Pet experiences many of the same benefits. Founded in 1980, Central Garden &amp; Pet has spent the last three decades growing from a small garden supply company to a provider of a range of products from dog chews and bird seed to soil supplements and natural insecticides. For much of its life, the company shipped these disparate goods via LTL and truckload carriers to retailers throughout the country, relying on each business unit to negotiate directly with their freight transportation providers. This arrangement worked fairly well for a small company, but as Central Garden &amp; Pet expanded, leadership decided to consolidate decision making.Burnett helped centralize the transportation decision making in 2015 with SMC³’s Bid$ense. Before Bid$ense, every business unit operated independently as far as negotiating with carriers.“There were a lot of different things just floating around,” he said. “We didn’t have master agreements in place; no national pricing at all. The pricing from carriers was just all over the place, depending on where you were.”The transformations he saw with Bid$ense were immediate. Burnett has been using the tool about every other year since its implementation at the company. Central Garden and Pet’s $19.6 million 2019 LTL bid saved the company just more than 9 percent when compared to its historical average. For Burnett, though, bid automation extends far beyond savings.“We knew that we weren’t getting the best pricing offer from our carriers just because nothing was centralized,” he continued. “We knew that if we combined everything from all these business units and paired it with one corporate offering, then it would drive some cost benefit with it.”When the company initially decided to centralize bid procurement, executives researched a number of different methodologies and technologies. In the end, though, Burnett found that Bid$ense was both widespread and well known, and that his carrier partners already knew how to use the application. Burnett also highlighted the data-cleansing process as a major benefit, saying the rigorous process ensures that carriers always return the best price.“It definitely has helped drive savings,” he said. “Any time you go out there and you drive that competitiveness with the carriers and they know they’re in a bid environment, it seems to sharpen their pencils.”Transportation procurement is an integral part of the modern supply chain. With Bid$ense, shippers can develop a strategic implementation plan that saves them time and money, but also helps them create strong relationships with their carrier partners. These carriers appreciate the solution’s data-cleansing process; when carriers receive a complete shipment history and future volume forecast, they don’t have to guess on pricing. Carriers that receive more data from shippers get a complete picture of that shipper’s freight, allowing them to accurately plan instead of simply preparing for the worst-case scenario. Clean data presented through an automated system can lead to both bigger shipment savings and a lasting partnership between carrier and customer.Whether customers are looking to streamline over-the-road transportation bidding by automating the RFP process or create an entirely new, centralized sourcing process, Bid$ense has the analytical horsepower to get the job done.SMC³ 2020 Customer Case Study

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046.jpg

Shippers save money, time with automated transportation bidding tools

SSA Marine Mexico has made significant strides in modernizing its infrastructure at the Port of Manzanillo, investing $15 million to enhance operational efficiency and sustainability at its facilities. This move is part of the company's broader strategy to remain at the forefront of the shipping and logistics industry. •	Strengthening Sustainability with Advanced Technology <figure class="joc_admin__inline-image-position-left joc_admin__inline-image-size-medium" data-figure-size="medium" data-figure-position="left"><img src="/content-assets/1730488295264_Cranes%20arrival%20to%20TEC%20I.png" alt="Cranes arrival to TEC I" class="joc_admin__inline-image-inherit"></figure> In July, SSA Marine Mexico added seven state-of-the-art E-RTG (Electric Rubber-Tired Gantry) cranes to its fleet, valued at $14 million. These advanced cranes were distributed across its two terminals: four cranes were assigned to the Multipurpose Terminal, and three to the Specialized Container Terminal I. What sets these cranes apart is their dual-operation capability, allowing them to function either on electric power or diesel fuel. This innovation plays a critical role in reducing the environmental impact of operations, contributing to a 7% increase in energy efficiency. This efficiency improvement is equivalent to eliminating nearly 4,000 tons of CO2 emissions annually, underscoring SSA Marine Mexico's commitment to sustainability. Through this acquisition, SSA Marine Mexico not only enhances its cargo-handling capabilities but also reinforces its leadership in integrating cutting-edge, eco-friendly technology in the maritime industry. The company continues to push the boundaries of efficiency and sustainability, ensuring long-term value for both its customers and the environment. •	Upgraded Facilities to Meet Growing Demand <figure class="joc_admin__inline-image-position-left joc_admin__inline-image-size-medium" data-figure-size="medium" data-figure-position="left"><img src="/content-assets/1730488350634_Multipurpose%20terminal.png" alt="Multipurpose Terminal" class="joc_admin__inline-image-inherit"></figure> In addition to the new cranes, SSA Marine Mexico has completed crucial modernization and repair work across its Multipurpose Terminal and Specialized Facility at the Port of Manzanillo. This $1 million investment targeted critical infrastructure enhancements, focusing on both structural integrity and operational functionality. Key improvements included leveling approximately 12,000 square meters in the dock area, along with the removal of outdated concrete curbs and asphalt layers. The upgraded space now features high-resistance pavers designed to optimize water drainage and prevent pooling, ensuring safer and more efficient operations. Moreover, the Specialized Facility saw significant upgrades, including the leveling of key warehouse areas to facilitate smoother cargo handling processes. These infrastructure improvements directly enhance the handling of TEUS (Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit containers), further demonstrating SSA Marine Mexico's unwavering commitment to continuous modernization, operational safety, and efficiency. With these initiatives, SSA Marine Mexico is well-positioned to meet the growing demands of the global shipping industry while setting new standards in sustainable port operations. LINK:<a href="https://www.ssamarine.mx/ssa-ing/index" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link"> https://www.ssamarine.mx/ssa-ing/index</a>

Cranes arrival to TEC I.png

SSA Marine Mexico Modernizes Facilities with $15 Million Investment 

If there’s one immutable truth in the world of logistics, it’s this: LTL is an inherently complex form of transportation. Tariffs, rates, DIM weights, transit times — it’s enough to confuse even seasoned logistics professionals. The solution to this knowledge gap has historically been on-the-job training or university supply chain education, but for a variety of reasons there is now a pressing need for third-party, remote LTL training that prepares logistics workers for transportation success. Global Scope Can Overlook Local Intricacies In the past, professionals looking to move into a supply chain career learned about the basics of supply chain from universities. However, many of these college supply chain programs are now global in scope, focusing on worldwide supply chain management instead of the intricacies of specialized domestic transportation. And even these programs, which used to be widespread, are becoming less common. LTL is not an industry of broad-brush strokes; supply chain professionals really need a pointillistic understanding of the logistics of LTL in order to excel in the industry. Accelerating Need for Dedicated LTL Education This lack of specified training put the onus on employers to prepare new hires with the LTL knowledge needed to do their jobs. Dedicated LTL study is a necessity, not a luxury. At the same time, changes in LTL and the broader supply chain world are accelerating. The reliance on e-commerce has ballooned since the start of the pandemic, and last-mile LTL shipments and related e-commerce strains on the supply chain won’t diminish once social distancing abates. That genie isn’t going back into the bottle. So supply chain employers need logistics workers that are fully versed in all aspects of the industry, ready to solve unique shipping and delivery problems based on their extensive supply chain knowledge But why care about LTL? It’s been reported that some shippers in today’s world are no longer concerned with what mode is used to ship their goods. A Multimodal Approach Ensures On-Time Delivery This mode agnosticism means supply chain stakeholders have to be well versed in all modes of transportation. As unforeseen weather events and other disruptions, such as protests, become more common, savvy logistics employees will need to be armed with familiarity of all modes, not just the most popular, to ensure that freight is delivered on time, without damage, and in the most financially expedient way possible. Offerings like SMC³’s LTL online education courses cover a wide range of topics from LTL basics and operations to more advanced concepts like pricing analytics and transportation law. The company also has plans to continually refresh content, adding new expert presenters and taking the feedback of students to make the courses even better as time goes on. Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://logisticstrainingcenter.com/smc3-courses/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">SMC³’s LTL Online Education program</a>&nbsp;and view the 2021 hybrid schedule, featuring live industry experts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smc3.com/onlinelearning2021/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">here.</a>

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046 (1).jpg

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

SUBSCRIBE TODAY: Choose a plan that fits your needs

Subscribe Now - Anonymous - Offer Box

Subscribe Today

START A FREE TRIAL: Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Offer Box

Free Trial

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE: Use code STSW20 and save 25% on annual subscription!


Subscribe Now - Free Trials - Offer Box

UPGRADE TODAY AND SAVE: Use code GUW795 and upgrade to a Gold subscription today for just $795!

Upgrade Subscription - Offer Box

Upgrade Subscription

20% OFF ON TPM25: Register today and redeem your Gold subscriber discount!

TPM Discount - Gold 

20% OFF ON TPM25

The premier conference for the global container shipping and supply chain community

TPM Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend TPM25

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

QI Report - Rectangle Box

Quarterly Intelligence

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Savings Index

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

Gateway

The only editorially independent conference for the breakbulk & project cargo industry

Breakbulk Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend Breakbulk25

The latest port news from the Journal of Commerce spans the globe from North Carolina and Florida to Shanghai and Singapore. Port news includes port automation, terminal construction projects, the future of decarbonization and net-zero shipping, dredging, port hinterland connectivity, labor, disruption, port congestion and cargo flow.

Drayage

Port infrastructure

Breakbulk ports

Longshore labor

Stay informed on port news worldwide with Journal of Commerce. From decarbonization to labor updates, get insights on global developments.

Port News | Journal of Commerce

Breakbulk News shipping | Journal of Commerce

Container shipping news and analysis of ocean container shipping, logistics, supply chains, technology and end-to-end connectivity.

Container Shipping News | Journal of Commerce

News and analysis of ocean containerized cargo movement, logistics, supply chains, technology, and end-to-end connectivity. Maritime news and analysis of containerized ocean cargo movement, breakbulk and roll-on and roll-off shipping from origin to destination.

Latest News

More News & Analysis

NYSHEX says will launch ocean freight rate indexes next year

Global shippers’ alliance to launch pioneering e-fuel ocean tender

Green ocean corridors hitting ‘feasibility wall’: Global Maritime Forum